One detransitioned woman’s experience with electrolysis by Elizabeth Edens

Facial hair is one of the lingering effects of transition. Electrolysis has been an effective method of facial hair removal for me, and has become a normalized part of my weekly routine.¹

I hydrate intensely the day before my appointment, as it helps with the effectiveness of the electrolysis process. I apply my lidocaine cream in the car before I drive the 20 minutes to my appointment. I have to be careful not to put too much on, because this medication can affect blood pressure. I highly recommend getting lidocaine/ prilocaine cream from a doctor. In the USA, this requires a prescription.

I have found it is most effective to focus on a one-inch to two-inch area of my face at a time.

This works because it ensures you hit the same follicles a second or third time, which can eliminate these follicles faster over time.

there, as this makes the whole experience more painful. I find it less painful to think about something that makes me smile. When I feel those emotions coming up, I redirect them; now is not the time! I include this, not to deter you from treatment, but to share that this may be a normal experience for us and not to worry.

I usually go for 45 minutes to an hour, depending on my pain tolerance that day.

Types of Electrolysis

Galvanic Electrolysis

This is the oldest technique currently in use. It is a chemical method that utilizes a direct electrical current to convert normal body salt and water in the hair follicle into a compound capable of destroying the dermal papilla. The chemical is produced only in the follicle and does not affect any other area.

Thermolysis

This method uses a high-frequency current to generate heat in the area influenced by the current. This heat cauterizes and destroys the dermal papilla.

Blend

This method combines the two currents in the same probe. Thermolysis enhances the effectiveness of the galvanic method, resulting in a faster process.

I now see an electrologist who uses a blended technique.

When I first detransitioned, I needed to shave twice a day. After undergoing electrolysis on and off for about five years, this is no longer the case. The time required to notice a difference varies for everyone. I know one woman who removed all her facial hair in six months, going to her electrologist twice a week for 90-minute sessions.

Last Thoughts

It would be hugely beneficial for detransitioners if the cost of hair removal could be subsidized in some way. Ironically, many institutions offer micro-grants for hair removal to so-called “trans women”. I encourage detrans women to apply for these; we are WOMEN who have transitioned. No need to clarify anything further to the grant givers!

Another helpful development has been the sisterhood with women with Hirsutism in Facebook groups. Women with Hirsutism experience similar hair growth on account of androgens in their systems, usually brought about by Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). I encourage detransitioners to embrace the similarities in their experiences rather than focusing on differences, and to use spaces and resources for women affected by the issues we struggle with. There are other women who struggle with facial hair growth for reasons unrelated to detransition. Here’s an opportunity to connect to the broader world again, without focusing on our unique situation.

A mother holds the line for five years as her son moves through a transgender identity and eventually returns to himself.

When people talk about desistance they sometimes imagine a short episode, a phase that passes within months. In reality, for many families the process unfolds over years. Parents must live through long stretches of uncertainty, holding their ground while their child experiments with identities that may or may not last.

Part three of The Desistance Series tells the story of Susan, a mother whose son Brendan identified as transgender throughout most of his teenage years. During that time he grew his hair long, wore make-up, adopted a female name at school, and even lived for a year in a girls’ dormitory at college. All the while, Susan and her husband held to one central boundary - there would be no medical intervention.

Their experience illustrates a pattern many parents recognise. Adolescence brings experimentation, confusion, and sometimes intense identification with new social narratives. What parents often fear most is that these shifting identities will quickly become medicalised and concretised before a young person has time to mature and reflect.

When Brendan was fourteen he told his parents he was gay. It was 2017. Susan and her husband were not surprised and did not treat it as a crisis. They had suspected it might be the case and simply carried on with life as normal.

Brendan was lonely at the time and had recently fallen in with a new group of friends. He spent long hours online. Four months after coming out as gay he sent his parents a message telling them he was transgender and needed estrogen.

There had been earlier signs that something was shifting. He had brought home a book about gender, started painting his fingernails, and spoke more often about identity. Still, the speed of the change startled his parents.

What they did not know at the time was that Brendan had been meeting secretly with the school counsellor at his public school. The meetings were happening several times a day. The counsellor was strongly affirming and encouraged the transgender interpretation of his feelings. Susan and her husband only discovered this later when they looked through their son’s emails.

They immediately told the school counsellor to stop seeing him. Instead they found their own therapist outside the school system. Susan had begun searching online for information and came across 4thWaveNow, Parents of ROGD Kids and the work of Sasha Ayad. Sasha was just beginning her practice and had openings and Brendan began seeing her.

For a long time Brendan’s presentation remained relatively restrained. He grew his hair long and painted his fingernails, but he did not dress as a girl until three or four years into the process. Around the same time he began using a different name at school, something his parents only discovered later.

During his senior year he began wearing make-up and more overtly feminine clothes. Throughout this time Susan and her husband remained clear about one boundary. There would be no medical intervention.

Brendan himself was a compliant type and not confrontational. He trusted his parents and their decisions, though he returned periodically to the idea of hormones and puberty blockers whenever he was distressed.

Susan eventually noticed a pattern – the requests for hormones often appeared when he was anxious or overwhelmed.

The five years were extremely tense. Susan and her husband were open about their views and told Brendan they did not believe in transgender theory. They told him he would always be male.

In senior year in high school, Brendan started to dress like a girl and wear make-up. The following year, when he attended the local college, he used a female name and lived in a girls’ dormitory at a local college.

Conversations at home became very difficult. Susan’s sister was supportive of the parents and did not accept the transgender explanation, but other members of the extended family were less sympathetic.

Susan describes herself as politically liberal and her husband as conservative with socially liberal values. Their acceptance of Brendan’s homosexuality had never been in doubt. What they struggled with was the idea that he needed medical transition.

The parents never issued a direct ultimatum about paying for college if he pursued hormones, but the message was implied. Again and again they asked him to wait. Again and again he did.

Living in the girls’ dormitory eventually produced its own reality check. Brendan struggled to find his place among the female students. After a year he returned home for the summer and a few days later he told his parents he was no longer transgender.

The change happened quickly. Within weeks he cut his hair and began buying new clothes. He downplayed the years of struggle and asked his parents not to make a big deal about it.

For Susan and her husband, the relief was enormous. Brendan now says he believes he needed to go through the experience. From fourteen to nineteen he felt compelled to explore his identity fully. He does not see those years as negative and believes his parents worried more than they needed to.

Susan sees it differently. She believes several things helped him come through it. The family kept ordinary life going as much as possible. They allowed him to express himself through clothes and appearance. Above all, they held to one principle - wait.

Brendan attended counselling with Sasha Ayad for four years. The heavy lift, as always, fell on the parents, who had to hold steady while their son struggled.

Brendan still lives with his parents and their relationship is close. During those years Susan became a lead for Parents of ROGD Kids, and she says the volunteering helped her endure what was often an exhausting and lonely experience.

Today Brendan is twenty-three. He desisted four years ago. He graduated from college, is open about being a gay man, and has had a boyfriend. For Susan, the outcome confirmed something she held onto throughout those difficult years - that hope, patience, persistence, and a steady refusal to rush a young person into irreversible decisions can make all the difference.

You can watch Susan’s story here:

Genspect hosted Life Beyond Transition on Thursday March 12^th in Washington DC. This was the largest gathering of detransitioners ever assembled, with over 70 people joining in for the gathering.

Having more detransitioners in the room than ever before marks a turning point in how the trans phenomenon is understood.

For the first time detransitioners were not being viewed as isolated individuals, online testimonies, or marginal voices, but came together in significant numbers in person, in the political capital of the United States

Medical Panel Discussion on Detransition Medical Care

Left to right:: Drs. Lisa Anllo, Kurt Miceli, Quentin Van Meter, and Kary Hurd

One of the few long-term outcome studies available illustrates why this gap matters. Dhejne et al. (2011) conducted the longest follow-up study to date on the outcomes of “sex reassignment surgery”, tracking 324 individuals in Sweden over a 30-year period from 1973 to 2003. Compared with matched controls by birth year and sex, those who had undergone surgery showed significantly worse outcomes, including nearly 3 times higher psychiatric hospitalization rates, nearly 5 times more suicide attempts, and a suicide rate over 19 times higher than matched controls. Life beyond transition can be extremely difficult for some, yet this reality is often minimized, leaving those affected without adequate support.

Some of the detransitioners who attended Detrans Awareness Day 2026

Gender at your fingertips

The sources for the statistics we use are selected for their reliability. We mostly use peer-reviewed 

papers; however, we occasionally refer to government-commissioned studies, authoritative bodies' submissions to governmental commissions, published books, or doctoral theses. In a few cases, we provide references for the purpose of debunking unreliable data.

As this is an emerging field of research, the information on this page may develop over time. Statistics for the transgender population are often difficult to quantify as different definitions are used to describe the term "transgender". Our focus is to underpin the statements we provide with sound research. We know that these statements cannot comprehensively cover every topic; however, this initiative is intended to bring some much-needed clarity to this area of study.

Stats For Gender is powered by Genspect, an organization that advocates for a non-medicalised approach to gender dysphoria.

California teachers and administrators for whom the PRISM LGBTQ training runs counter to their religious and moral values are asked to contact The National Center for Law and Policy, who can provide guidance with filing an appropriate religious exemption.

Following law school graduation, while starting his civil litigation practice, he was invited to become an affiliate attorney of the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), from which Dean has received extensive training in pro-family, pro-life and pro-religious liberty matters at ADF’s outstanding National Litigation Academies (NLA). Because of Dean’s pro-bono work, he was invited to receive special training at ADF’s advanced NLA. Dean is proud to be an ADF affiliate attorney and member of ADF’s honor guard.

The Children's Education Opportunity Act is the latest attempt at providing California parents maximum flexibility when it comes to the education of their children.

2. Parents choose the best education option for their child
Parents select an eligible school that suits their child best.Options range from public and charter schools to private, faith-based institutions, and homeschooling. The chosen school coordinates with the ESA Trust board to allocate funds for educational expenses. Parents do not handle the money directly; transactions occur between the state-controlled ESA and the selected school.

3. Covered education expenses under the Education Savings Account
The ESA covers various educational expenses, including

•  transportation to and from school and school-related activities

4. Unused ESA funds roll over annually and accrue interest
Any unused funds within the student's ESA carry over each year, accruing interest to support future educational expenses throughout the student's life. This is not a voucher program where you lose the funding if you do not use it that year.

If you would like to help in the effort to gather enough signatures to get this important initiative on the 2026 ballot, please let us know.

Malpractice of Gender Surgery: A Candidate Weighs In

During this same period, medical interventions on minors expanded rapidly. A watchdog database reports that 13,994 minors received gender‑transition treatments between 2019 and 2023, including 5,747 surgeries and 8,579 hormone or puberty‑blocker interventions.

Even narrower insurance claims analyses confirm that hundreds of minors underwent breast removal surgeries during these years.

These numbers are no longer abstract. They now form the backdrop of the first successful de-transitioner malpractice lawsuit in American history, a verdict that marks a major turning point from the narrative that has been pushed on us from the medical community.

No Mainstream News Outlet Covered This Case!

On Friday [January 30^th], a Westchester, New York jury awarded $2 million to Fox Varian, a young woman who had her healthy breasts removed at age 16 under what was presented to her as “gender‑affirming care.” Her psychologist and surgeon were found liable after a three‑week trial attended by independent reporters, and not a single mainstream media organization.

The total absence of mainstream media coverage is striking.

For three weeks, testimony unfolded about the speed, certainty, and lack of safeguards with which a confused teenager was ushered toward irreversible surgery. And for three weeks, the nation’s largest newsrooms looked away.

When the verdict was read, Varian reportedly wept and embraced her mother, a moment of relief after years of physical and emotional fallout.

Independent journalist Benjamin Ryan, who sat through the entire trial, called the case “just the beginning,” noting that he has tracked numerous similar lawsuits preparing to move forward. He added that legal experts believe tort law may ultimately reshape or even dismantle the current model of pediatric gender medicine.

Here is a list of costs associated with "gender affirming care"

And this is just the beginning. More money will be made from:

And you have a patient for life that needs to have monthly checkups indefinitely with hormones for life, lab work for life and mental health care for life.

Thousands of irreversible procedures were performed on developing children, many of whom are now adults grappling with regret, infertility, chronic pain, or loss of sexual function. The damage done is irreversible. President Trump cut off the federal funding to these medical facilities forcing the closure of Los Angeles Children's Hospital, the largest children's gender surgery center in 2025.

The Varian verdict signals that juries may be willing to hold clinicians accountable for rushing minors into life‑altering decisions.

As more de-transitioners come forward, more lawsuits are filed, and more medical records are scrutinized, the country will be forced to confront what happened between 2019 and 2024, a period future historians may view as a moral stain on the academic and medical community where they coerced vulnerable children into irreversible medicalization.

Healthy body parts were removed. Lifelong medical dependency was created. Teenagers in distress were fast‑tracked into surgeries that even adult patients often approach with caution. History will not look kindly on this moment.

And now, for the first time, a jury has said: This was wrong.

The Varian verdict is not the end of the story; it is the beginning. More cases are coming. More evidence will surface. More young adults will speak out, and the flood gates have opened.

Carol Pefley
Candidate for Ca State Assembly

A Very Important Win for Parental Rights

“The court’s landmark reaffirmation of substantive due process, its vindication of religious liberty, and its approval of class-wide relief together set a historic precedent that will dismantle secret gender transition policies across the country,” Jonna added.

Challenging the Gender Secrecy Policies

The Thomas More Society sued on behalf of teachers in the state who feared punishment if they refused to lie about a student’s gender identity. Parents and other teachers joined the lawsuit, challenging the Escondido Union School District’s policy of hiding students’ gender identities from parents unless students consented to reveal them.

The teachers also sued the California Department of Education, which has a similar policy.

While a district court judge issued a permanent injunction blocking the schools from enforcing gender secrecy policies, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit granted the school district and the state a stay of the injunction.

The Supreme Court’s Parental Rights Ruling

The Supreme Court issued an unsigned opinion vacating the 9th Circuit’s stay when it comes to the parents. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would have ruled in favor of the parents and the teachers, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor would not have taken up the case.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote a concurring opinion, which Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined. Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent, which Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined.

“The parents who assert a free exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their children in accordance with those beliefs,” the court ruled.

“California’s policies violate those beliefs” and impose an “unacceptable” burden on them, the opinion stated. “Indeed, the intrusion on parents’ free exercise rights here—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ storybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in Mahmoud.”

California claims that its policies advance a compelling interest in student safety and privacy, but the court ruled that “those policies cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents.”

The court also found that the parents would likely succeed in claiming the state violated their due process rights.

“Under long-established precedent, parents—not the state—have primary authority with respect to ‘the upbringing and education of children.’ The right protected by these precedents includes the right not to be shut out of participation in decisions regarding their children’s mental health,” the opinion stated.

The court found that “the denial of plaintiffs’ constitutional rights during the potentially protracted appellate process constitutes irreparable harm.”

The court also noted that the district court’s injunction permits California “to shield children from unfit parents by enforcing child-abuse laws and removing children from parental custody in appropriate cases,” thus allowing for the key interest of protecting children while protecting parental rights.

Justice Kagan faulted the court for issuing an emergency ruling after receiving “scant and, frankly, inadequate briefing about the legal issues in dispute,” and without holding an oral argument or debating in conference.

fundamental liberty interests recognized by the Supreme Court. But the right preexists the constitution itself and is an intrinsic human right.”

"Keep linking arms.

Keep praying for California. California is worth fighting for."

- Sojna Shaw   

What must California do to comply with FERPA?

^* LEA stands for "Local Educational Agency". In California, LEA refers to any public board of education or other public authority legally constituted within the state that has administrative control or direction over public elementary or secondary schools.  This includes school districts, county offices of education, direct-funded charter schools, and special education local plan areas (SELPA).

Schools couldn’t tell parents that Johnny called himself Jenny or that Nancy called herself Nicholas. The schools could only accommodate the students, use the pronouns they wanted, and feed obvious emotional illness..

The stalwart plaintiffs, however, didn’t let the battle end there. They saw their case through to the Supreme Court, where this week, six of nine justices stood up for the obvious and natural rights of parents.

You get just one guess at who the three dissenters were.

Updated Opt-Out Letter

Taking into consideration recent decisions by the Supreme Court.

America First Legal has released an updated parental opt-out template letter following SCOTUS’s decision in Mirabelli v. Bonta, reaffirming parents’ constitutional right to direct their children’s upbringing and education.

The template letter is available through AFL’s Parent and Student Action Center, which provides families with toolkits, sample letters, and resources to help defend parental rights and safeguard their children’s education.

[Insert Date]

[School Principal's Name]

[School Name]

[School Street Address]

[School City, State and Zip Code]

Re: Compliance with Federal Law/Opt-Out for [Student Name]

Dear [School Official]:

My name is [your name], and I am the [parent/legal guardian] of [child's full name], a student in the [grade level] grade at [name of school[.

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed that parents have a constitutional right to direct the religious upbringing of their children. See Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U.S. ___,___ (2025), slip op. at 19. The Court emphasized that this right is violated whenever government policies "substantially interfer[e] with the religious development of children." Id. In that particular case, the Court held that the Montgomery County Board of Education's decision to introduce LGBTQ-inclusive storybooks into the curriculum--combined with its decision to withhold notice to parents and to forbid opt-outs--substantially interferes with the religious development of children and imposes an unconstitutional burden on religious exercise. Id. at 21-22.

On March 2, 2026, the Supreme Court cited Mahmoud in the Court's latest ruling on the rights of parents to parent their children in Mirabelli v. Bonta, 607 U.S. ___,___ (2026). In Mirabelli, the Court found that the "unconsented facilitation of a child's gender transition is greater than the indoctrination of LGBTQ story books" it had addressed in Mahmoud. The Court in Mirabelli also found that the school district's violated the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and the longstanding and well-established right of parents "to direct the upbringing and education of their children." The Court went on to hold that "parents who object to the challenged policies or seek religious exemptions" have standing to sue "because they are objects of the challenged policy."

Mahmoud and Mirabelli should be instructive for federally funded schools when it comed to parents' rights, just as failing to comply with the Protection of Pupil Rights Mendment (PPRA) puts schools at risk of losing federal funds. The PPRA entitles parents to inspect "[a]ll instructional materials, including teacher's manuals, films, tapes, or other supplementary material which will be used in connection with any survey,analysis, or evaluation" at school. See 20 U.S.C. § 1232h(a). Related regulations require prior written consent from a parent or legal guardian before a child may be subjected to questions about political affiliations, mental health, psychological challenges, sexual behavior, sexual attitudes, and other topics. See 34 C.F.R. § 98.4.

In light of Mahmoud, Mirabelli, and preexisting federal law, I am writing to request reasonable prior notice of, the right to be informed about and to inspect, and a meaningful opportunity to consent or opt out my child out of any formal or informal instruction that involves exposure to or discussion of gender identity, transgenderism, gender-affirming care, pronouns inconsistent with biological sex, sexual activity, sexual orientation, sexual preferences, LBGTQ-related matters, policies regarding students use of locker rooms, bathrooms, or similar facilities, or any other related topics.

I am also providing formal notice that I object to [child’s full name]’s use of any opposite-sex bathrooms, locker rooms, name change, or change in pronoun as these activities conflict with my family’s sincerely held religious beliefs. If [child’s full name] engages or requests to engage in any of these activities, I require prompt written notice, as these requests also conflict with my family’s sincerely held religious beliefs. To that end, I also require prompt notification in the event any other student - whose identity I do not seek - at [name of school] uses or is permitted to use an opposite-sex bathroom or locker room to which my child would also have access. Moreover, I also object to any physical, psychiatric, or psychological examination, testing, or treatment described in 34 C.F.R. § 98.4(c). I will understand your failure to honor any of these requests as a denial of my right to direct the religious upbringing of my child.

I look forward to your prompt confirmation of receipt of my notice. I also look forward to learning how [school district] will comply with Mahmoud v. Taylor, Mirabelli v. Bonta, and the PPRA to ensure that all parents receive prior notice and an opportunity to opt out of any formal or informal instruction of their children that might conflict with the family’s sincerely held religious beliefs or otherwise interfere with the parental right to direct religious upbringing.

You can reach me via email at [email] or by phone at [phone].

Sincerely,

[your name]

Christian Teachers Must Remain Strong!

Guide me in your truth and teach me, for you are God my Savior...  Psalm 25:5

is no mere professional development. It is an ideological loyalty test demanding that educators affirm beliefs about gender and sexuality that directly contradict biblical truth.

Yet there is good news: Christian teachers do not have to surrender their faith to keep their jobs. Under both the First Amendment and federal and state civil rights laws, they have the right to request a religious exemption from trainings that violate their sincerely held beliefs.

That’s why the National Center for Law and Policy, led by constitutional attorney Dean Broyles, is stepping forward to defend teachers of faith who refuse to compromise their convictions. “Teachers’ civil rights do not evaporate when they enter our public schools,” Broyles said. “California’s coercive mandatory PRISM LGBTQ identity cultural competency training directly conflicts with and seeks to actively undermine the deeply held religious beliefs of millions of California families, students, and public-school teachers.”

What the Law Demands — and Why It Is Unconstitutional

Under AB 5, public school teachers in grades 7-12 must complete the PRISM Training, or a closely aligned alternative, which instructs participants to affirm concepts like gender fluidity and to use students’ self-selected pronouns, even when doing so violates their conscience. The program also directs teachers to withhold information from parents about a child’s gender identity if the child has not given permission, falsely claiming that minors have a “right to privacy” from their own parents.

The training explicitly labels traditional Christian beliefs as harmful “heteronormativity,” “homophobic,” and “transphobic,” and equates adherence to biblical truth with discrimination. In essence, teachers are told they must deny their faith or face discipline.

A recent federal court ruling in Mirabelli v. Olson reaffirmed that public school districts cannot compel teachers to lie to parents or affirm gender ideology in violation of their faith. The court condemned such policies as a “trifecta of harm” to teachers, students, and parents. That decision opened the door for teachers statewide to challenge similar unconstitutional policies.

One Teacher’s Example of Courage

One Southern California teacher, represented by Broyles, has formally requested a religious accommodation from his district. In Broyles’s letter to school officials, he explains that the teacher’s faith requires him to speak truthfully, honor parents’ rights, and affirm that God created humanity male and female (Genesis 1:27; Matthew 19:4). Participating in PRISM training would force him to endorse falsehoods about human sexuality and violate his conscience before God.

“The government has no legitimate place marginalizing, shaming, and demonizing the sincere religious beliefs of its good citizens,” Broyles wrote. “State and local LGBTQ+ laws or policies do not supersede well-established federal constitutional rights or a teacher’s right to be free from religious discrimination.”

Broyles also warned that districts cannot retaliate against teachers who request religious accommodation, and that his office will be monitoring any cases of harassment or discrimination.

A Call for Courage

Many Christian teachers are afraid. They worry that refusing the training might cost them their jobs or reputations. Others are tempted to simply “click through” the training and answer as the state demands, just to keep the peace. But as followers of Christ, we are called to “obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29) and to stand firm in truth even when pressured to conform.

CFC’s Call to Action

California Family Council Vice President Greg Burt is urging both teachers and school board members to take a public stand for truth.

“Christian teachers should not quietly comply with a state mandate that calls evil good and good evil,” said Greg Burt, Vice President of California Family Council. “By standing up for their own rights, teachers are also defending the civil rights of parents and students, protecting every family’s freedom to live and speak according to biblical truth. We need courageous believers in every classroom and on every school board willing to draw a line and say, ‘We will not bow.’ Our children need to see adults who are unashamed to stand for God’s truth about life, family, and gender, no matter the cost.”

Take Action

If you are a Christian teacher being forced to take this training, you have legal options. Contact the National Center for Law and Policy for assistance in drafting a religious accommodation request. You can also reach out to California Family Council for resources and support.

Now is not the time for silent compliance. The next generation of students is watching. When faithful teachers stand firm, they bear witness to the truth that God, not the government, defines human identity, morality, and truth.

Just as Daniel, Esther, and the three Hebrew men stood unashamed before kings and rulers, California’s Christian teachers must now stand before their school boards and declare:

“We will not bow.”

Biden CIA Warned About ‘Traditional Motherhood’ and ‘Homemaking’ as White Extremist Tactics

When the Biden administration turned its attention to concerned parents in the fall of 2021, the Central Intelligence Agency drafted a memo warning about white racial extremists recruiting women for “traditional motherhood” and “homemaking.”

“There is absolutely no room for bias in our work and when we identify instances where analytic rigor has been compromised, we have a responsibility to correct the record,” Ratcliffe added. He stated that actions such as releasing the document “underscore our commitment to transparency, accountability, and objective intelligence analysis.

America First Legal drew attention to the document on X.

The CIA warned about the “great replacement” theory, which it framed as extremist.

“White REMVEs and their sympathizers have claimed in online posts that it is essential for white families to have as many biological children as possible to counter the rising birthrates among non-white populations, white REMVEs allege that this rise is a conspiracy, which they have termed the ‘great replacement,’” the assessment states.

The CIA discussed a specific organization—the identity of which has been redacted—and noted that this group “has lauded motherhood and homemaking as women’s most important responsibility.”

“This is what happens when woke ideology replaces actual threat-based intelligence collection and analysis,” Gene Hamilton, president of America First Legal, told The Daily Signal in a statement Thursday.

“The Biden administration was obsessed with deconstructing our country,” Hamilton added. “Motherhood was suspect. Homemaking was suspect. Everyday Americans were suspect. Under the Biden administration, mainstream American life was turned into a threat profile. We should never forget how deep the rot went.”

This memo came as a growing movement of parents protested at school board meetings, demanding that schools reopen amid the COVID-19 pandemic, that schools relax requirements for children to wear face masks, and that schools cease promoting transgender ideology and racially divisive policies.

Intelligence-Assessment-100621     

On Sept. 29, the National School Boards Association sent a letter to then-President Joe Biden, comparing these concerned parents to domestic terrorists. Then-Attorney General Merrick Garland responded with an Oct. 4 memo to the FBI, U.S. attorneys, and the Justice Department’s criminal division to craft “strategies for addressing threats against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.” The NSBA later rescinded the letter and apologized amid pushback.

The Biden Justice Department worked closely with the Southern Poverty Law Center, a left-wing public interest law firm that leverages its history of suing the Ku Klux Klan into bankruptcy to place mainstream conservative and Christian groups on a “hate map” with Klan chapters. In 2023, the SPLC added Moms for Liberty and other concerned parents’ groups to the “hate map.”

The FBI’s Richmond office would go on to cite the SPLC in drafting a memo on “radical-traditional Catholics.” While the FBI later rescinded the memo, the SPLC has kept the “radical-traditional Catholic hate groups” on the “hate map.”

The FBI officially cut all ties with the SPLC last year.

The CIA did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but this story will be updated with any response.

An Inconvenient Truth

trans identified children like her daughter. When PITT received her story they immediately got her in touch with people in their network who would be in a position to help her and to get her story visibility with a broader audience. All of that is currently in motion. Please take the time to read this heartbreaking story for yourself.

I am the grandmother of a 15 year old girl, Sage Lily.

I arrived at the detention center bright and early the next morning. However, once there I received surprising and devastating news—Sage was now being represented by a juvenile attorney and would not be allowed to return to Virginia with us, and I would not be allowed to see her until a court hearing could take place. And, on top of that, my husband and I were going to be investigated for "abuse" because we called her “Sage” and not “Draco”, and used female pronouns in reference to her, rather than he/him.

Abuse charges were filed against my husband and myself and Sage was put in the BOYS’ UNIT of the Children’s Home—where she was AGAIN abused. Following this she was placed in a private room. Again, I was not advised that Sage (with a female body), was placed in a boys’ unit. So now my traumatized child had been kidnapped, sex trafficked, and then sexually abused again while in the care of the state, rather than returning to her loving home to rebuild. Instead of the trauma care that Sage desperately needed when she was rescued, she was manipulated and our family was treated unfairly. Instead of getting the help she desperately needed and deserved, she was fated to experience even more pain and suffering.

After an investigation by both Maryland and Virginia DSS, the abuse charges were determined to be unfounded. Yet Sage still was not allowed to come home. Instead, she was put on center stage to push a political and gender agenda for a Maryland public defender with clearly no knowledge of trauma caused by sexual exploitation of a child.

A typical 14 year old is emotionally immature and struggles with many issues. Sage had additional issues on top of these normal concerns, as she had experienced severe trauma before the age of two. Now with this new trauma of being sex trafficked, she was even more vulnerable. Despite therapeutic residential programs in Virginia that were willing and able to accept her, the Maryland public defender attorney said Sage could not go because of the trans identification.  And the Maryland juvenile court judge agreed!

On November 8th, 2021, the Maryland judge finally released Sage to a facility in Virginia. This was immediately appealed the next day (going against the interstate law for custody) and Maryland continued to retain custody of my child, hoping to place Sage in a foster home in Maryland. Why? Because I called her Sage, her legal name, and not Draco. In this case, it was simply because my husband and I forgot—because certainly, desperate to get our child back, we would have done anything, including using the name Draco. Now our abused child, the victim of a federal sex trafficking crime, was being sent to a foster home because of gender ideology. There is no way to interpret that this was in my child’s best interest.

To my horror, the Maryland Marshal found that Sage had been sent from Maryland to Dallas, Texas.  On January 24, 2022, the Texas Marshal, through the grace of God, found her in a locked room where, once again, she had been abused by a predator. He had used her for pornography, sold her body for money, starved her, beat her, and drugged her. It was a true miracle she was found. So many children are never found. But, her exploitation would never have happened in the first place if not for the intervention of the state of Maryland.

Now Sage is in a residential therapeutic facility for the next 1-2 years depending on how well she responds to the program. She will struggle with these consequences for the rest of her life. She is only 15 years old. She spent her 15th birthday, October 20th, in Maryland—and I was not even allowed to visit her. I cried all day that day.

I want to share her story with anyone and everyone who will listen. I am just one small voice for thousands of these children that our society is endangering by passing laws that give them more rights than the parents who are there to safeguard and protect them. These new laws are putting vulnerable kids like mine in danger. These kids are not capable of the decisions they are empowered with, and adults are stepping in to exploit them, while their parents have been relegated to the sidelines. These kids’ brains aren’t even fully developed until the age of 25! We’re allowing these children, schools and medical facilities to legally keep secrets from the parents. This is very real and very scary. I should know.

We need to become one loud voice and warn people that their children’s lives are at stake—literally. There are sick predators out there watching and waiting for these confused kids. Our society is leading them astray by allowing these laws to be passed. It’s a very real issue that deserves much more attention. Think this can’t happen to you? It can. Please help by sharing Sage’s story.

Find these accounts helpful? PITT wants to hear your story. Send submissions to PITT@genspect.org

Wave of California Teacher Strikes ‘Is No Coincidence’

If your child’s teacher hasn’t threatened to go on strike recently, they probably will soon.

Thousands of California K-12 teachers have walked off their jobs or voted to strike in the past few months, as part of a strategic, statewide effort by the California Teachers Association to boost salaries and benefits — and get the public’s attention.

“All these districts going out on strike — it’s not a coincidence at all,” said David Goldberg, president of the California Teachers Association, the state’s largest teachers union. “Everywhere in the state there are people with unmet needs. The conditions have been ripe for a long time.”

San Francisco teachers went on strike for four days this month. West Contra Costa teachers went on strike in December. San Diego, Woodland, Apple Valley, Duarte and Madera teachers planned to strike in the past few months but reached a settlement at the last minute. Teachers in Los Angeles, Oakland, Dublin, West Sacramento, Twin Rivers and Natomas have voted overwhelmingly to strike. In Berkeley, Soquel and other districts, teachers are holding rallies and appear headed for strike votes.

Ten local teachers unions under the umbrella of the California Teachers Association worked for years to align their contracts so they’d expire at the same time: June 30, 2025. The idea, Goldberg said, was to trigger a wave of negotiations and potential strikes to garner public attention and flex political muscle. Teachers unions from at least a dozen other districts have also joined the effort, even though they weren’t part of the original cohort.

said, whose union represents about 310,000 teachers. “Teachers are learning from each other, and getting some clarity on how to win resources for public schools.”

Public and political priorities

Teacher contracts vary by district, but the demands are similar: higher salaries, better benefits and amenities that affect student well-being, such as sanctuary protection for immigrants. 

Considering the ever-escalating cost of living in California, the demands are not a surprise, said Julia Koppich, an education consultant who specializes in labor-management relations.

Teachers in expensive cities like San Francisco often can’t afford to live near their jobs, she said, noting that starting teachers in San Francisco Unified earn about $80,000. San Francisco’s starting police officers, by comparison, make about $120,000.

It’s been a frustration for the teaching profession for decades, she said. But districts don’t have much control over their revenues and substantial increases in spending would have to come from the state, she said.

“To be sure, the issue of marshaling sufficient resources is a district conversation about teacher worth,” Koppich said. “But, ultimately, it’s a state discussion about public and political priorities.”

Angeles Unified, San Diego Unified and San Francisco Unified, used some of their funds to increase teacher pay or hire permanent staff, which they’re now struggling to pay for after the grant money ended.

So even though the state has increased K-12 school funding the past few years, some districts are financially strapped. It’s unclear whether they can afford teachers’ demands for higher salaries or more generous benefits, said Marguerite Roza, director of the Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.

Los Angeles Unified, for example, gave its teachers 5% raises plus a $2,000 one-time stipend and a $500 bonus. The district’s nurses, who are also represented by the union, got $5,000 stipends.

“The unions are saying, ‘We know you have an ATM back there. If you were nice, you’d push the buttons,’” Roza said. But districts’ money is tight, she said, “so we’re at a stand off.”

If districts agree to teachers’ demands, cuts will have to come from somewhere — most likely from programs considered non-essential, such as sports, electives, advanced placement classes and other offerings, she said. 

It could also mean staff layoffs. Tutors, classroom aides and newer teachers would be the most vulnerable. 

Those cuts would harm low-income students the most, Roza said, because they’re more likely to rely on special school programs and attend schools with newer teachers. Low-income students are also more likely to be affected by a strike, she said, because families typically have fewer options for child care and those students are more likely to suffer from academic disruptions.

School boards need to stand up for those students, she said, and do a better job negotiating with teachers unions. That entails more transparency about finances and a willingness to close under-used schools.

“It’s so irresponsible to erode services for vulnerable students because you don’t have a spine,” Roza said. 

He noted that charter schools and private schools are rarely unionized, and sometimes have better outcomes than traditional public schools. A handful of other states don’t allow teachers to collectively bargain, and at least 35 don’t allow teachers unions to strike.

“The union uses kids as leverage,” said Christensen, who ran for state superintendent of public instruction in 2022. “Right now, CTA is the biggest evil in California education.”

Next steps in San Francisco

In San Francisco, parent Meredith Dodson said she’s relieved the strike is over. Although most parents support teachers and believe they deserve better compensation, the strike was stressful  for families and disrupted learning for thousands of students.

The $183 million settlement includes raises and improved benefits for teachers, which the district plans to pay for by draining its reserve funds.

Parents now are bracing for the inevitable cuts. The district’s finances remain shaky, and aren’t likely to improve any time soon. 

“What comes next? Layoffs? Increased class sizes? State intervention?” said Dodson, who is executive director of the San Francisco Parents Coalition, a parent advocacy group. “There’s going to be some hard questions for the board, and they’re going to have to ask themselves, what’s best for kids?”

Support School Board Trustees

Who Protect Children and Promote Liberty

California Chapters of Moms for Liberty Endorse Sonja Shaw 

for California State Superintendent of Public Instruction

The Science Is In: Girls Can't Be Boys & Boys Can't Be Girls

An opinion piece written by Peter Parisi which appeared in The Daily Signal on March 8 2026

Has anyone noticed that climate change alarmist Democrats no longer refer to those who don’t buy into their baseless warnings of impending eco-apocalypse as “science deniers”?

That isn’t only because their six decades of predictions of environmental doom consistently have failed to come to pass. It’s also because they themselves have become the actual science deniers.

That epithet can now be turned against Democrats because of their adamant denial of the biological science of chromosomes—XX (female) and XY (male)—in the battle over so-called transgender rights. Dismissing chromosome science as “sex assigned at birth” doesn’t change that.

If only we could detect the differences.

“This poorly drafted bill will have numerous and significant consequences far beyond the intent to limit the right for trans people to use the appropriate bathroom,” the governor said in her latest laughable veto message. (To the contrary, the new state law will compel gender-confused people to use the appropriate bathroom—the one based on biology.)

According to Kelly, those other supposedly “significant consequences” of SB 244 include:

“If your grandfather is in a nursing home in a shared room, as a granddaughter, you would not be able to visit him.

“If your wife is in a shared hospital room, as a husband, you would not be able to visit her.

“If your sister is living in a dorm at [Kansas State University], as a brother, you would not be able to visit her in her room.”

Nursing home and hospital rooms have one-at-a-time restrooms, and college dormitories have visitor bathrooms, so those are all risible red herrings.

“I believe the Legislature should stay out of the business of telling Kansans how to go to the bathroom,” Kelly concluded, “and instead stay focused on how to make life more affordable for Kansans.”

In the governor’s telling, Kansas lawmakers can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. The two issues are neither mutually exclusive nor a zero-sum game, so that too is patent nonsense.

“This bill protects girls and women, the ones feminists used to claim to stand for,” said state Rep. Carolyn Caiharr, a Republican.

In an article headlined “On trans rights, Dems prepare for 2026,” The Washington Post reported Feb. 19 that the pro-LGBTQ+ Human Rights Campaign confessed to having been caught flat-footed by Donald Trump’s 2024 anti-transgender “they/them” pronouns presidential campaign attack ads against Kamala Harris.

“We’ve got to be prepared for it, address it head-on, then be prepared to pivot,” HRC President Kelley Robinson said of the expectation that Republicans will reprise the attacks this fall.

“Address it head-on”? Democrats have their work cut out for them on that front. How do you make a persuasive case for allowing gender-confused males to invade females’ private spaces?

general electorate,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Mike Marinella told The Post. “Republicans will continue to draw that stark contrast and remind voters exactly who’s on their side and who isn’t.”

They are already doing that in hotly contested Senate races in North Carolina and Georgia, even as Rep. Pramila Jayapal, Washington Democrat, and Sen. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat, introduced a federal “Transgender Bill of Rights” on Feb. 11.

So, like chromosome science, something else is undeniable: Democrats continue to push the transgender agenda at their own political peril.

Originally published by The Washington Times

Roger Sherman: The Founder Who Signed All 4 Documents

Roger Sherman was a pivotal Founding Father of the United States, renowned for being the only person to sign all four of the nation’s most important founding documents: the Continental Association (1774), the Declaration of Independence (1776), the Articles of Confederation (1777), and the U.S. Constitution (1787).

Born on April 19, 1721, in Newton, Massachusetts, Sherman was largely self-educated, rising from a background as a shoemaker and farmer to become a respected lawyer, judge, and statesman. After moving to New Milford, Connecticut, he built a successful career in law, surveying, and public service, eventually serving in the Connecticut House of Representatives and the Superior Court.

Sherman played a crucial role at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, where he proposed the Connecticut Compromise—a pivotal agreement that established a bicameral Congress: the House of Representatives (based on population) and the Senate (equal representation for each state). This compromise was essential in securing ratification of the Constitution.

He served as a U.S. Representative from Connecticut (1789–1791) and then as a U.S. Senator (1791–1793) until his death on July 23, 1793. He was also the first mayor of New Haven, Connecticut, and a dedicated supporter of education, including serving as treasurer of Yale College.

Despite his immense contributions, Sherman remains one of the most overlooked Founding Fathers, often overshadowed by more prominent figures, yet his legacy endures through the structure of American government.

LGBTQ Issues Continue

An opinion piece written by Tyler O'Neil which appeared in The Daily Signal on March 10 2026

online pharmacies and other sources that do not appear to require prescriptions or age verification.

Dr. Kurt Miceli, a psychiatrist and chief medical officer at Do No Harm, blamed the transgender movement—specifically the Human Rights Campaign and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health—for creating the conditions behind this phenomenon.

“The unfortunate reality is that these online vendors have gained a market due to the normalization of dangerous hormonal interventions as ‘gender-affirming care’ and the resulting growth of the child transgender industry more broadly,” he told The Daily Signal.

“Activist organizations like the Human Rights Campaign and ideologically motivated groups like WPATH have succeeded in selling experimental, irreversible procedures as medically necessary treatments for children,” Miceli noted. “Is it any wonder that minors believe this to be true, and may be turning to alternative sources that don’t require prescriptions?”

“Our report reveals how online pharmacies may enable minors to obtain cross-sex hormones with alarming ease,” Miceli said in a separate statement on the report. “From websites listing online vendors across the globe to marketplaces for ‘homebrewed’ hormones, we found a multitude of troubling pathways that appear to bypass basic safeguards and regulatory oversight.”

“Gender-confused kids should not be able to purchase potent, experimental medications with just a few simple clicks,” he added. “These hormones carry significant risks, including effects that can be irreversible. We urge the FDA and other federal agencies to investigate any potential unlawful sellers and, where appropriate, for states to do the same when their laws are being violated.”

Many states passed laws protecting minors from sex-rejecting procedures, and that helps explain why companies may offer minors a way to obtain these drugs without a prescription.

‘Homebrewed’ Transgender Drugs

The Do No Harm report reveals major hubs from which users can obtain drugs for “hormone replacement therapy” or HRT.

“A cursory internet search for information related to pediatric medical transition reveals a host of resources directing users to online pharmacies, distribution networks for ‘homebrewed’ hormones, and guides on self-administering cross-sex hormones,” the report states.

The website Transgender Map, for example, says it aims to inform readers about “how to make a gender transition,” and lists several online pharmacies located on multiple continents. The website includes this disclaimer: “getting hormones without a prescription is against the law.”

HRT.Coffee and HRT Cafe provide information on pharmacies and hormone vendors, including accepted payment methods, country of origin, and product details. HRT Cafe includes a list of “unregulated” online pharmacies where users can purchase hormones online, and the website states that the pharmacies do not require prescriptions. As of Tuesday morning, HRT Cafe appears to be offline.

The Food and Drug Administration also did not respond by publication time.

A Man Cannot Be A Woman

Moms for Liberty Santa Clara Works with 917 Society

Getting Constitutions into the hands of every 8^th grader

Midterms are Fast Approaching. Your Vote Is Vitally Important

For The Calendar

Teach the Children Well

America Celebrates Its 250^th Birthday

1776-2026

Rooting Out Pornographic Books In School Libraries

Parents just scored a big win!

SB 1250, an Oklahoma bill supported by Take Back the Classroom to remove sexually explicit materials from public school libraries, has passed the Oklahoma Senate and is now headed to the House of Representatives.

This wasn’t a close call. 39-8. The vote fell along party lines, with Republicans backing the measure to stop taxpayer-funded schools from making explicit material available to minors.

It’s happening everywhere.

And parents are starting to push back.

Follow the Money

The organizations working to block parents and push and defend having sexually explicit materials in schools are powered by massive donor funding:

• ACLU Foundation — $169.1M (FY2024)
• ACLU (c)(4) — $141.3M (FY2024)
• American Library Association (ALA) — $25.3M (2024)
• PEN America — $21.2M (2023)

That’s over $356 million in donations driving pressure campaigns, legal intimidation, and public messaging designed to make parents back down. Please do not back down!

Ongoing Education and Updates:

A regularly updated blog is maintained featuring the latest developments related to sexually explicit materials in schools. In addition, we offer training webinars to educate, empower, and connect individuals engaged in this important work.

At every level focus remains the same, namely to provide clear, practical tools that lead to meaningful results and protect the hearts and minds of our children.

Detransition: A Love Story

The classic coming-of-age story is always one of metamorphosis in which the hero changes from a dependent child into a competent young adult ready to begin the most creative phase of life. It is a difficult journey at the best of times, and much harder for those whose childhoods have been marked by instability or family breakup. And yet, even with these challenges, generations of people successfully navigated the way to adulthood, due, in no small part, to the familiar terrain.

change their bodies and to reassure them both that they were truly trans. Fortunately, they also found each other.

For Zoe and her partner, Ian, the story was different. Coming of age at a time when everything—including their sex—was framed as a choice, their journeys were far harder. Like many of their peers, Zoe and Ian channeled their inchoate longing to grow up and find their place in the world into a narrow quest for identity. Not identity in the classic sense of an ever-evolving by-product of how we live our lives and our relationships with others, but as an internal essence to be revealed and a persona to be adopted. When they began to question their gender, they found an army of professionals only too happy to help them change their bodies and to reassure them both that they were truly trans. Fortunately, they also found each other.

Beware: Schools Continue To Push Trans Ideology

Parents send their kids to school to learn reading, writing, math… not sexual orientations and gender identities.

But that’s exactly what’s happening in classrooms across the country.

Recently, a New York middle school teacher taught an eighth-grade health lesson using a pro-transgender article that discussed things like chest binding and taking testosterone.

Yes — to middle schoolers.

When confronted, the teacher didn’t deny it. In fact, they confirmed the lesson was taught and explained that the goal was to “raise awareness about different sexual orientations and gender identities.”

Schools are increasingly using classroom time to introduce children to controversial gender ideology, often without informing parents and without any regard for whether the material is age-appropriate.

Middle school health classes should not be a venue for promoting medicalized gender activism to 13- and 14-year-olds.

And yet it keeps happening!

That’s because teachers’ unions, activist groups, and bureaucrats are working overtime to normalize these ideas in schools.

Our team works every day to uncover what’s happening in classrooms, bring it to light, and empower parents to demand accountability from school districts.

Parents deserve transparency about what their children are learning in school. 

Childhood In Need Of Restoration

A Parent Coach Explains — And Offers a Path Forward

More parents are reporting that their children blame their mothers for childhood “traumas” and other negative experiences from their childhood or present day. Children of all ages bring up seemingly insignificant issues, call it trauma, then blame mom for their inability to cope with it.

childhood or present day. Children of all ages bring up seemingly insignificant issues, call it a trauma, then blame mom for their inability to cope with it.

It could be as simple as discipline for not doing a chore.

I’m not talking about discipline in the form of physical or verbal abuse. These children are reporting that any discipline is being called trauma-inducing. One mother shared that her daughter recalled a “traumatic” memory when mom took her privileges away for not putting away her laundry.

Another mother reported that her adult son became disrespectful and cut off communication with her after she asked him to take on more responsibility around the house.

Our clients’ children also fault their mothers for negative childhood experiences, unrelated to discipline. One mother said her child told her that their therapist helped them realize that it was burdensome and traumatizing to help with household chores, miss out on fun activities, and support their mother while she was seriously ill. Another child told her mother that she was traumatized by having a fire alarm go off in preschool, but mom telling her that she would be okay wasn’t supportive enough. The mother didn’t even remember the event or realize that it was so traumatic for her daughter.

These mothers are simply doing what most good parents do.

They require their children to take responsibility, then dish out a consequence when the child doesn’t follow through. Others ask their children to help or cope with life events. They believe they were appropriately supportive. Even if they didn’t handle it perfectly, they weren’t neglectful or abusive.

Still, their children blame mothers for their inability to cope, and seemingly carry that grief with them for years.

their fathers. Strangely, it happens even if the child comes out to their mother but not their father.

But why is this happening?

Our working belief is that this resentment for mothers is influenced by the trans cult. The trans movement exhibits all the features of a cult. Cults intentionally cut their members off from loving family members and friends, especially those who aren’t “believers.” It’s easy to break up families when a child disconnects from the most nurturing person in their life. Their mom. We suspect that people who reject their sex are being coached to break connections with their mother.

Still, kids who aren’t in therapy are exhibiting these behaviors as well. We know that device and social media addiction are key reasons for sex rejection. Social media has an endless supply of affirming information that discourages maintaining family connections, especially when parents are “transphobes.”

When I posted about this on X, I received many comments from parents who could relate.

Understandably, mothers who stayed home and also homeschooled their kids take this hardest. Can you imagine dedicating your entire life to raising a child only to have them grow up and resent you? Not only are these children rejecting their sex and the name you gave them, but they are also rewriting the past and rejecting you.

stressful, and it is unproductive if you aren’t psychologically healthy.

So, if you are a mother experiencing this, how do you navigate it?

Your first order of business is to listen and help them see another perspective, all while never letting them see you sweat.

• Don’t show anger or defensiveness when they tell you their discovery.

• Acknowledge their emotions and ask them clarifying questions to find out exactly what they mean.

• Actively listen and show empathy.

• Just allow them time to express their feelings and explain their perspective.

Then, let them know that you never thought about it that way. You do not need to agree with them or allow them to rewrite history. Instead, use the opportunity to show their resilience and growth from the experience.

This gives them a positive perspective to consider.

Next, Mama, get a life. First, get out of parent groups that talk about this issue. The successful parents are not in these groups. The parents who are there aren’t successful with desistance. They ruminate on the negative behaviors and the pain. That is anxiety-provoking and depressing.

• Second, find some activities that have nothing to do with helping your kids.

• Do something exhilarating and just plain fun.

• Also, take care of your health and appearance.

• Focus on your health and nutrition. Exercise.

• Get your hair and nails done.

• Do whatever you once did to make you feel good about yourself. Volunteer, reconnect with your spouse, enjoy time with family and friends, and love on the other children.

• They need you too.

If moms are not successful doing this on their own, our third recommendation is therapy. We often have to direct mothers to a therapist so they can benefit from our coaching. Desistance coaching is more effective when parents can fully engage and participate.

But the most important part of having mom rejuvenated and healthy is that the kids notice the difference. Why is this important? For one, they learn that mom’s life doesn’t revolve around them. That is a reality check they need to face. Also, they witness you demonstrating resilience and healthy coping. Youth who reject their sex use it as a maladaptive coping strategy. Observing parents who cope well provides a model for them.

In conclusion, the emotional journey that mothers of trans-identifying children face is undeniably complex and painful. The observed patterns of blame and resentment highlight the significant impact of external influences, including affirming therapists and social media, on family dynamics. As parents, it is crucial to foster open communication and understanding while gently challenging the narratives being pushed by these external forces.

Introducing James Lindsay to the Restore Childhood Community

Six years ago today, we were told to “stay home, stay safe,” and “flatten the curve.”

Most of us had never heard the phrase “out of an abundance of caution” and then suddenly, we heard nothing else. That moment marked something beyond a public health response.

It was the day many of us began to understand, in real time, what a coordinated propaganda campaign actually looks and feels like.

I have spent the years since trying to decode it. And no one has been more essential to that education than Dr. James Lindsay.

philosophy of science, and postmodern theory. He has appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience, Fox News, Glenn Beck, and NPR, and his work has been praised by scholars across the political spectrum for its rigor and clarity.

What makes James Lindsay indispensable — and why I keep coming back to his work — is that he doesn’t just name the problem. He teaches you how it works. He has spent years mapping the architecture of ideological capture: how movements are manufactured, how language is weaponized, how institutions are hollowed out, and how ordinary people become unwitting participants in campaigns designed by others. He gave us the tools to see Social Justice for what it was. Now he’s applying those same tools to what’s happening on the right.

On this sixth anniversary of the pandemic shutdowns and school closures, when our society shut down to reorder itself, I thought there was no better moment to introduce James to the Restore Childhood community. I asked James if I could share this piece — which appeared originally on X — with our audience, and he graciously said yes.

If you’re new to his work, consider this your crash course. And if you’ve been following him for years, you already know: he’s usually about eighteen months ahead of everyone else. - Natalya

Listen, kids. Doesn’t that seem really f--king weird to you? The main thing your whole cohort cares about is another country, one that is allied with us and kicking ass in the most Top Gun way you can imagine? Doesn’t it seem weird that everyone in your generation is focused on another country that isn’t even attacking us?

It should seem weird because it is weird.

The reason it’s happening is not because Israel is relevant to all of your lives.

Do you think that was normal?

No, it wasn’t normal either. Every Gen X or older person can tell you that the young people in their generations had many, varied, and diverse interests. There was no top of mind for everyone in a generation. But the Millennials got it with privilege and Social Justice, and you’re getting it with Israel and “America First.”

Kids, listen to me.

This is not normal.

This is not natural.

This is the result of dedicated propaganda campaigns.

You are being propagandized.

The method of propaganda being used is primarily something called “reflexivity,” which is a method developed by George Soros to create mass movements of belief around deliberate lies that he called “fertile fallacies.”

He called them “fertile fallacies” because they are lies (fallacies, errors, differences between what’s believed and what’s really true) that can take off (fertile) in a population.

They’re “lies with legs,” it has been said.

The method of “reflexivity” is to get everyone believing the same erroneous stuff in an increasing way at the same time. This is accomplished through local media saturation: everyone is talking about the same thing in the same way at the same time, and eventually so are your friends. Then the ideas “reflect” all around you creating a sense of social consensus and widespread belief.

Reflexive campaigns are everywhere now.

On the Left, we call them the “Current Thing.” We have rafts of memes of the NPCs all changing their tune or saying the same thing or being reprogrammed or being hypnotized into the newest Current Thing, which changes when the media does.

That’s you! Now! You’re being Sorosed!

The reason everyone in your generation is suddenly talking about Israel is because propagandists in your midst have made Israel your “current thing.” It is a reflexive campaign, and you aren’t just a victim but are playing your part.

The framing for that reflexive campaign is “America First.”

The propagandists are exploiting your love of country and frustration with bad actors in our governments and their “global partners,” which are increasingly being exposed, to get you attached to a bunch of fertile fallacies about Israel, all of which play upon your fears, anxieties, frustrations, and love for your beautiful country.

Here are some:

• “Israel is not really our greatest ally. It isn’t even an ally.”

• “We can’t afford things at home because Israel gets aid money.”

• “This is Israel’s War, and I’m not dying in Israel’s War.”

• “Israel attacked the USS Liberty and isn’t our friend.”

• “Jeffrey Epstein was working with Israel.”

• “Israel is too weak to exist on its own so it manipulates America into supporting it.”

• “Israel is a settler-colonialist project that is doing a genocide of the indigenous Palestinians.” (OOPS MY BAD THAT’S THE ONE THEY’RE TELLING YOUR FRIENDS ON THE LEFT)

• “Israel is a warmongering vassal state under with US protectorate status that is seeking to become a regional power by starting random wars that it drags the US into and doing genocide.” (AHH THAT’S YOUR VERSION OF THE SAME LIE!)

None of these (or dozens more) is accurate.

They are all fallacies (lies) designed to take off in the social and emotional environments you find yourselves in, driven by media and political propagandists who have their own agendas but need your help (just like the NPCs on the Left).

The reason you are so obsessed (and, yes, that’s obsession) with Israel is because you are being targeted by reflexive propaganda campaigns designed to make you all fixate on this object that can be alleged to cause most of your problems. In fact, it causes few, if any, of your problems and is actively solving many problems you are blessed enough not to even know that you have.

Friends, you are being propagandized.

You are being led to focus and fixate on these things because it serves dark interests that are not your own.

The same Soros techniques that work on the Left are being used on you, and you’re helping them work.

How do you stop them?

1. Stop listening to propagandists. This is actually really important.

2. Seek out the opposite side of what you’re being told and try to understand the truth.

3. Use critical thinking.

4. Ask yourself if you’re being asked to think about issues or asked to feel about issues.

5. Be skeptical of something that appears suddenly in the news or on platforms that everyone is repeating all the time all at once. That’s how Soros’s reflexivity works.

6. Understand, just like how it was true with CNN and other trusted news sources, that trusted sources can be bought, at which point they are not trustworthy anymore and are using your trust to manipulate you.

The biggest anti-America operation that’s happening right now is the sudden skeptical-to-hostile fixation on Israel. Notice that it’s only been a thing since October 7, 2023, exactly the same time the parallel propaganda wave began on the Left. What you’re participating in is the side of that same campaign tailored to your values, your anxieties, and your frustrations. No different.

This campaign is rapidly turning people against not just Israel and often Jews (against your values, I’m sure), but against MAGA, Trump, the United States and its role in the world, and the Republican Party.

Who benefits from that?

Not you. Not us.

Isn’t it weird to you that so many people suddenly believe exactly the opposite of what they believed in 2022? Isn’t it weird to you that everyone considers this such a big issue?

It should be weird because it is.

That’s the signature of a propaganda campaign, and you are its primary targets.

Off The Press  @OffThePress1            

awareness of those who regret undergoing transgender procedures and “detransition” back to identify with their biological sex.

Regardless of whether a patient took puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones or uderwent invasive reconstructive surgery for so-called "gender-affirming care," Christine said detrnsitioners need not only clinical healthcare but also support from policymakers.

"They need mental health support, they need emotional support, they need love, and they need to understand that this government, this administration, this secretary of HHS, and this assistant secretary for health stand with them to protect them and get them through these things," Christine said.

(The Center Square) – As work continues on the state budget, education and finance officials told California legislators on Thursday that taxpayer funding for Proposition 98, which funds K-12 education and two years of community college, was making teachers and district officials nervous throughout the state.

Concerns were aired during a meeting held by the Senate Budget Subcommittee on Education on Thursday morning in Sacramento.

“The volatility of our revenues is on full display,” Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez, the chair of the Senate Budget Subcommittee on Education, said at the beginning of the meeting at the Capitol.

“We are seeing the Prop. 98 minimum guarantee at unprecedented levels and with a declining student population," said Pérez, D-Pasadena.

The state’s precarious budget situation was first detailed in a November 2025 budget outlook report compiled by the state’s Legislative Analyst’s Office. Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget, released in January, projected a $21.7 billion increase in Prop. 98 funding this year.

K-12 education takes up about 40% of California’s overall budget, Pérez said.

Proposition 98, which California voters passed at the ballot box in 1988, requires that the state spend a minimum amount of taxpayer dollars to adequately fund K-12 education and the first two years of community college, often referred to as K-14.

Prop. 98 is one of two measures the state is required to fund in this year’s budget. The other is Proposition 2, which passed in 2014 and authorizes bond measures to help pay for K-12 and community college facilities, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.

The governor’s budget proposed $115.9 billion in funding for the Prop. 98 “settle-up,” which essentially pays public education in California back for Prop. 98 funding K-14 schools should have gotten in the two previous school years. At the time, schools didn't get the entire amount. The previous “settle-up” allocation was $121.4 billion, according to the governor’s budget.

“I have to acknowledge there is heartburn in our districts as it relates to Prop. 98,” state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond testified during the committee meeting. “The $6 billion that is being held up as part of the settle-up has created angst for many of our districts.”

using safety as an issue — that was the same thing that was used during Jim Crow laws.”

The Cal State Board of Trustees has faced sustained pressure from both faculty advocacy groups and state officials as it navigates federal mandates and shifting state policy on gender identity in public higher education.

The California Faculty Association, which represents roughly 29,000 faculty across the CSU system, has been an active voice in opposing policies its members view as targeting LGBTQ+ students and employees. Gallo’s remarks reflect a broader tension playing out on campuses statewide as institutions grapple with the intersection of transgender rights, campus safety policy, and political pressure from Sacramento and Washington.

The Supreme Court has rejected California's claim that its practices balance parental rights with student welfare

California required school districts to hide students' gender confusion from parents in written policies and, after it got sued, in teacher training materials it hid from a court. 

The Supreme Court rejected the Golden State's claim that its practices balance parental rights with student welfare, granting an emergency application to reinstate a permanent injunction while the case proceeds at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Maine's Great Salt Bay School Board is hoping for better luck before the high court in a challenge to allegedly unwritten policies that contradict its on-the-books parental involvement requirements for gender-confused students.

The district opposes plaintiff Amber Lavigne's SCOTUS petition to review a 1st Circuit ruling that dismissed her lawsuit due to "obvious alternative explanations" for the social transitioning of her 13-year-old daughter rather than an "unwritten de facto policy," arguing her allegations were too vague to be heard in court and especially not SCOTUS at this stage.

The mother alleged school staff secretly addressed the girl as a male, a social transition, but also that an in-school social worker gave her chest binders to flatten her breasts, a medical intervention that can cause physical damage, showing its official policy was a ruse.

Lavigne's lawyers at the Goldwater Institute recently filed their reply, accusing the district of evading the core issue: "the Board can be held liable if it follows an unconstitutional policy" regardless of whether it's written or not.

Nineteen states led by South Carolina, a conservative think tank and a medical freedom advocacy group are backing Lavigne's petition, which first went before SCOTUS Feb. 20 with no action. (Justices often review petitions over several meetings before acting on them.)

America's Frontline Doctors, known for its early opposition to COVID-19 orthodoxy, said in a brief focused on the medical issues in the case: "Desistance statistics and the weight of research show that the parental opinions in this case are most likely correct, and the school’s approach is medically contraindicated. This is about saving lives."

It deemed euphemisms for medicalized gender transitions "intentional distractions" from the reality of a "permanent Frankenstein-esque mutilation of a minor child’s healthy body," going into gruesome detail about sexual dysfunction and maintenance of constructed genitals.

Such procedures can preemptively sterilize a minor, prevent breastfeeding and cause "permanent and irreversible damage to facial, body and vocal structures," the brief says. "The majority of both sexes have lifelong anorgasmia."

Required to 'disprove benign explanations' without access to hidden evidence

The district mocked Lavigne's theory of its municipal liability and denied there was even a circuit split on pleading standards in its Feb. 23 opposition brief, meaning SCOTUS can't even review the underlying issue upon which the 1st Circuit dismissed the case or preempt lower courts by reviewing the alleged "deprivation of a constitutional right."

Lavigne was "unequivocal before the District Court that she did not challenge the underlying conduct of the school officials as the source of her constitutional injury, nor did she challenge" the school board's written guidelines, just the supposedly unwritten policy of withholding information from parents, the opposition says.

It approvingly cited the 1st Circuit's dismissal of Lavigne's evidence for an unwritten policy: the board's denial that the secret transitioning violated any policy or law, the principal's statement about "misunderstanding" laws on confidentiality between students and social workers, and the board renewing the social worker's contract.

Referring to its brief at the 1st Circuit, the district said "just because an employee engages in conduct that does not violate a school policy, that does not mean that such conduct is the policy or practice of the District," which would require a "logical leap."

Lavigne waited until her SCOTUS petition to make the "distinct legal argument" that "reliance on obvious, alternative explanations requires implausibility of a plaintiff’s own alternative explanation," and to invoke other appeals courts' precedents beyond the 1st Circuit, so the issue is not "properly presented for review" to SCOTUS, it said.

The mother noted her good timing in her reply brief, with SCOTUS having reinstated the permanent injunction against California's policies just four days earlier and a week after the district's opposition.

Great Salt Bay's practice is little different than California's in writing, and its "argument ignores both Petitioner’s theory of the case and the plain facts," her brief says.

Statements and actions by the board and superintendent show "the logical and certainly plausible explanation" for the girl's secret transitioning is an unwritten policy of "noninvolvement" of parents when their children have gender confusion, since written guidelines require involvement but the district says Lavigne's noninvolvement didn't violate the policy.

Echoing the "Catch-22" complaint in another parental rights challenge to school secrecy, the brief says the district blames Lavigne for not asking for information the school allegedly withheld from her "but never explains" how she'd know to ask whether a social worker had given her daughter chest binders or if staff were using a male name and pronouns for her.

The 1st Circuit instead forced her to prove her "claim was more likely than other explanations for the facts," when Twombly requires only a plausible cause of action and warns judges not to dismiss a suit even if "actual proof of those facts" seems "improbable" at that stage.

A complaint must "only allege sufficient factual matter to permit a reasonable inference of liability" under Twombly, whose "settled rule [is] that plausible factual allegations must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff," the Manhattan Institute brief says.

If plaintiffs are required to "disprove benign explanations that they don’t have the information to disprove" because a "defendant’s internal processes" shroud the "evidence of intent, ratification, or institutional motive," it's hard to imagine how the former would show liability under the Monell precedent Lavigne is arguing, the institute says.

The statute of limitations has emerged as a significant obstacle for lawsuits like Soren Aldaco’s.

The Texas Supreme Court is weighing whether a young woman can still sue a psychologist who approved her breast removal surgery.

Soren Aldaco, the woman at the center of the case, was only 19 when she had the surgery, and suggested to The Epoch Times that regret from such acts might not come for years.

“If you’re a 13-year-old on puberty blockers, you might not realize you’re infertile until you’re 26 and you just got married and you’re trying to have kids,” she told The Epoch Times on Feb. 26.

Aldaco’s story is like those of many others who spent years “transitioning” as a teenager, only to change their minds later in life.

Following that verdict, two major medical groups said they would no longer endorse so-called gender surgeries for minors.

Jonathan Hullihan, general counsel at Remnant Law Firm in The Woodlands, Texas, told The Epoch Times that while the New York verdict was a “watershed moment,” the statute of limitations remained a significant obstacle.

Some have criticized attempts to penalize physicians through measures such as extending the statute of limitations.

“The targeting of physicians through these legal penalties impedes them from practicing evidence-based medicine and blocks patients from accessing standard of care treatments,” Madeline G. Chin, then a research fellow at the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, said in 2023.

Years-Long Process

Aldaco’s suit alleges that the letter contained multiple false statements about the “persistent” nature of her gender dysphoria. In reality, her feelings about gender “had been in a state of fluctuation” for some time.

“I got given surgeries and hormones, etc., where I really just needed a functional home life and some coping strategies,” she said. “On a personal level, I think that we’d be really surprised to find out how true that is for so many cases.”

Aldaco’s issues began at a young age, when she struggled with her identity and to fit in with peers.

Early puberty induced mental distress that caused her to reject her feminine body and wonder if she might be happier identifying as male. She settled on a fluctuating, nonbinary identity.

“Importantly, between 11 and 15, I very much saw it as a roleplay identity. ... There wasn’t a lot of cohesion to it,” she said.

As a teen, she would show up to school dressed in male clothes and wearing a chest binder; the next day, she would wear a flower crown and a dress.

Meanwhile, her psychological problems grew: At age 15, she had a manic episode and was hospitalized at the Mesa Springs psychiatric hospital in Fort Worth, Texas.

She told a psychiatrist there, Sreenath Nekkalapu, that she was uncomfortable discussing gender. But he “relentlessly pressed her on the topic by prompting her with trans-related questions and affirmations,” Aldaco’s lawsuit states.

changing the dosage, he referred her to other health care professionals to treat the symptoms.

One of those specialists suggested the hormones might be at fault, but Aldaco said she was so “gaslit” at the time that she “wrote off the doctor as being a bigot who was behind the times and merely pushing an agenda.”

“I was very dissociated from my body. ... I was smoking a bunch of weed and I just had all these mental health issues,” she said. “So I just really didn’t pick up on the way my body was falling apart, even though I was on like 10 different medications and wearing knee braces and riding around in a scooter.”

In an emergency follow up surgery, drains were stitched in to allow fluid to escape; Aldaco learned later that this is normally done during the initial procedure.

About six months after the surgery, she fully realized her “transition” was a mistake. She now says she’s a woman.

Attorneys for Nekkalapu, Perry, and Wood did not respond to requests for comment.

Darlene McCormick Sanchez contributed to this report.

As the United States engages in kinetic operations against Iranian targets in the Middle East, there are legitimate worries about terrorist activity here at home. Coupled with the long-term impact of the open border policies of the Biden administration, American citizens have reason to be fearful. 

According to a House Judiciary Committee report, from 2021 to 2024, Border Patrol encountered hundreds of “illegal aliens on the terror watchlist” and tens of thousands more from Asia and the Middle East. These numbers include over 500 Iranian nationals and tens of thousands of Chinese nationals. 

In addition to these serious concerns, there are other safety and national security vulnerabilities that have gone woefully unaddressed, specifically as related to the education system. For years, K-12 schools have been naively jeopardizing the safety of their students, unnecessarily exposing them and their families to foreign adversaries. 

walkouts, the chances of pre-planned attacks by radical actors will likely increase. Parents have been right to question how readily some school administrators permit student street activism during the school day. 

While these protests and walkouts leave children highly susceptible to physical danger, various schools allow staff to take trips to maligned nations with no regard to how international tensions put the children at risk. 

For instance, roughly one hundred Tamalpais High School (California) students and staff were slated to take a nine-day trip to Havana, Cuba, in February. Previous district-approved pilgrimages to the communist nation included a visit to the Museum of the Revolution and a “Tobacco Farm Experience.” 

Tacoma Public Schools’ (Washington) Lincoln High is planning a “cultural trip” to China in the summer of 2026. The high school has had a long-standing relationship with a “sister school” in China that features regular trips to the communist country. In fact, in 2024, Chinese leader Xi Jinping himself invited students to travel to the Asian country during his visit to Lincoln High. 

Student trips are not the only cause for concern. The presence of foreign nationals in our school system also warrants closer scrutiny.

For years, K-12 schools across the country have participated in the Confucius Classrooms program facilitated by the Chinese Ministry of Education through nonprofits. Part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the program often includes financing, books and materials, and sending Chinese nationals to teach in American schools. 

More troubling still is that over 30 of the school districts participating in the Confucius program were located near military bases. This not only puts those installations at risk of surveillance or possibly worse, but it also leaves military families and personnel exposed to bad actors.

These fears are not speculative. If China is willing to spy and harass its own people on American soil and on university campuses, what keeps it from doing the same to Americans? 

In light of all of this, federal, state, and local leaders need to prioritize the safety and security of American K-12 students and schools. Protecting students begins with simple steps such as limiting unsupervised walkouts and ending trips to adversarial countries. Additionally, passage of the DETERRENT and TRACE acts by Congress could be a vital first step to increasing protections for educational institutions. 

Complacency is no longer an option. Policymakers and school officials must closely examine the potential threats that foreign adversaries pose to American children and families through the school system. America’s future depends on it. 

Re the Mirabelli v Bonta decision:

The Supreme Court voted 6–3 in favor of a group of parents challenging a school district policy and California law that required school officials to keep a student’s gender identity information from parents.

In Mirabelli v Bonta, the Court restored a lower court ruling that blocked schools from “misleading parents about their child’s gender presentation” and required schools to follow parents’ instructions about the names and pronouns their children use. The case will return to the lower courts to decide the policy itself, and the policy is paused while that happens.

The majority said the parents are likely to ultimately win their case because California’s policies may violate two constitutional rights: their right to freely practice their religion and their right to direct the upbringing and education of their children.

The Court also pointed to its recent decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor. The justices said the burden on parents in this case is even greater because schools were actively facilitating a child’s gender transition without parental consent.

The decision applies only in California, though it may signal the Court’s willingness to consider similar cases in the future. Two such cases are already pending before the Court.

A group of teachers also challenged the policy, arguing it violated their First Amendment rights, but the Court declined to block the policy for teachers at this stage.

The Court’s three liberal justices dissented. Still, even Justice Elena Kagan acknowledged that California’s policy might cross a constitutional line by keeping parents from information that could affect their children’s health and well-being.

Even though the ruling only applies in California, it provides parents and teachers in other states with a legal framework they can use to challenge similar policies. In other words, while the decision does not automatically change school rules nationwide, it strengthens the argument that parents have a constitutional right to important information about their children at school.

A justice system that forgets victims is not justice at all.

For more than 15 years, I have worked with groups such as the Golden State Bail Agents Association and Crime Victims United. Their mission is simple: make sure victims are not forgotten. In California today, that mission feels like an uphill fight.

Two recent cases should alarm every parent in this state.

The first is David Allen Funston.

Funston was not a minor offender who simply made a mistake. He was a calculated child predator. He drove through Sacramento neighborhoods in his van, carrying dolls, candy, and toys to attract young children. When the children came closer, he kidnapped, molested, and raped them.

Some of his victims were as young as three years old.

A judge sentenced Funston in 1999 to three life terms in prison. The court recognized exactly what he was: a predator who hunted children.

At sentencing, the judge called Funston exactly what he was: “the monster every parent fears.”

The only reason that didn’t happen is because the Placer County District Attorney stepped in at the last moment. Prosecutors revived an unfiled 1996 child molestation case just as Funston was about to be released, keeping him behind bars.

Without that intervention, he would already be back on the streets. 

Now, another case is bringing the same nightmare to light.

Roberto Detrinidad broke into a San Francisco apartment in the middle of the night and raped a woman while she was sleeping in her own bed. He admitted that he targeted her after seeing her through a window and believed he could get away with it.

Many Californians go through their days unaware that decisions made during legislative hearings and signed by the governor have real consequences. These decisions are now causing violent predators and sexual offenders to be pushed back into our communities.

The government has one fundamental duty: to protect its citizens.

In California today, the system too often protects criminals instead.

Victims already live with the trauma of what happened to them. When the state releases the person responsible, it makes those victims relive it all over again.

The recent cases involving Funston and Detrinidad should serve as a wake-up call. A justice system that forgets victims is not justice at all.

Become a Part of the Frontlines...

* The ability to act fearlessly as a joyful warrior, someone who is willing to stand on solid principles and fight for what is right, especially when faced with a hostile environment.

Interested in learning more? Please reach out to our chapter's membership coordinator Kingslee.

Want to See the Change? Be the Change...

Organizations whose efforts we support...

Think on this...

Moms for Liberty Santa Clara County operates as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization.

The organization's primary mission is to organize, educate and empower parents
to defend their parental rights at all levels of government.

Visit us at https://momsforlibertysantaclara.com
Email us at MomsForLibertySCC@gmail.com

Want to read past newsletters? Click Here
Wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter? Click Here

Our physical mailing address: 1050 Kiely Blvd.  # 2453  Santa Clara, CA  95055