Moms for Liberty Santa Clara County

Monthly
Newsletter

 01 Jun 2025 edition


Distributed the 1st of each month.

Read the latest news about the struggle to preserve parental rights at all levels of government. Learn what the Santa Clara Moms for Liberty group has been up to, what upcoming events and functions we're having, and how you can help.


View latest newsletter in browser...

Per an article in Forbes, a timeline of the removal of DEI from various large companies and organizations.


April 10, 2025

  • IBM shifted its supplier diversity goals away from race and gender to focus on all small businesses and veteran-led companies and stopped linking executive compensation to diversity hiring goals, Bloomberg reported, citing an internal memo that detailed the “inherent tensions in practicing inclusion.”

  • Gannett, the United States’ largest newspaper publisher, said it will no longer publish diversity data and removed references to diversity from its corporate website, Nieman Lab reported, citing a company spokesperson who referenced Trumps DEI executive order.

April 8, 2025

  • Constellation Brands Inc., which brews Corona and Modelo Especial beer, renamed its DEI team to “inclusive culture,” reframed its supplier diversity goals to focus on all small businesses and will no longer participate in Human Rights Campaign external surveys, Bloomberg reported.

March 26, 2025

  • UnitedHealth Group removed webpages dedicated to diversity, equity and inclusion and instead adopted language like “culture of belonging,” TechCrunch first reported (Company spokesperson Tyler Mason told the outlet it seeks to “comply with existing and emerging laws while striving to support what is best for the communities we serve”).

March 22, 2025

  • The MLB told the AP it removed references to diversity from its careers site to ensure it complies with federal law, but said the organization’s “values on diversity remain unchanged.”

March 5, 2025

  • Victoria’s Secret is reevaluating a supplier diversity goal and halting a goal to promote a certain percentage of Black workers, a Victoria’s Secret representative told Bloomberg, a shift for the company that made investments in DEI throughout the 2020s following a reported workplace harassment scandal as well as controversy and boycotts over an alleged lack of body type diversity among its models.

Feb. 28, 2025

  • State Street, which installed the famous “Fearless Girl” statue in Manhattan in 2017, previously expected boards in major indexes to be 30% female and S&P 500 companies to have at least one racial minority director, but these requirements appear to have been dropped in the company’s new proxy voting guidance published on its website, which the company told Reuters was “to ensure alignment with global protocols and local laws and regulations.”

Feb. 27, 2025

  • Warner Bros. Discovery said in a staff memo it remains committed to building an “inclusive team” but would rename its DEI programs to simply “inclusion,” cease participating in external diversity surveys and implement a “uniform and consistent application process” across all of its development programs, multiple outlets reported (the company still reportedly said: “Our success absolutely depends on having a team that’s truly diverse”).

  • Goldman Sachs, weeks after axing a diversity requirement for companies it takes public, dropped a section about “diversity and inclusion” from an annual filing released Thursday, which CEO David Solomon said was to “reflect developments in the law in the U.S.,” Reuters reported.

Feb. 26, 2025

  • Paramount will no longer use diversity targets—tied to race or gender—in hiring, and the company has begun removing DEI language from its website, the New York Times and other outlets reported, citing a company memo in which Paramount executives cited Trump’s anti-DEI executive orders.

Feb. 25, 2025

  • Bank of America will end “aspirational” targets for diversity hiring and replaced the word “diversity” with “talent” and “opportunity” in an annual report, Bloomberg reported.

  • BlackRock cut references to DEI in its latest annual report, three years after the company’s CEO Larry Fink said the company “must embed DEI into everything we do.”

Feb. 20, 2025

  • Citigroup will rename its “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and Talent Management” team to “Talent Management and Engagement,” and it will end its diversity hiring goals, Bloomberg reported.

  • Pepsi will no longer use representation goals in hiring, will transition its “Chief DEI Officer” position to focus more on employee development and will shift its supplier diversity program to focus on all small businesses, according to an internal memo posted on X by anti-DEI activist Robby Starbuck—who said he contacted the company about “doing a story about their woke policies.”

Feb. 17, 2025

  • JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup were “removing or watering down” language around their DEI efforts, unnamed people familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal, and other banks including Wells Fargo and Bank of America have begun reviewing their DEI language, as well.

Feb. 13, 2025

  • Coca-Cola and PepsiCo were preparing to comply with Trump’s executive order that sought to ban DEI programs as both receive government contracts, Bloomberg reported; Coca-Cola’s changes will likely be disclosed in future Securities and Exchange Commission filings, according to the report, and PepsiCo’s latest filing removed references to its “diverse workforce” and DEI.

Feb. 12, 2025

  • Dimon said he “saw how we were spending money on some of this stupid s—-, and it really pissed me off,” stating in response to a question about DEI he will “cancel” some expenses he views as wasteful, Bloomberg reported, though he also reiterated his commitment to Black, Hispanic and LGBTQ community outreach, a viewpoint he has repeated in recent weeks even as other companies roll back their DEI commitments—and he has previously slammed “ridiculous” anti-DEI crusaders targeting his company. (Forbes has reached out to JPMorgan Chase for comment).

Feb. 11, 2025

  • Goldman Sachs said it would drop a requirement that a company it takes public must have at least two diverse members on its board of directors, one of whom had to be a woman, which a company spokesperson told Axios is because of “legal developments related to board diversity requirements” (A federal appeals court in December ruled Nasdaq could not require companies to have board diversity quotas.)

  • Disney is making several changes to its DEI approach, including shifting its “Diversity & Inclusion” performance metric used to evaluate employees to “Talent Strategy,” which is focused more on business outcomes, while also axing its “Reimagine Tomorrow” website which highlights diverse employees and adjusting content warnings it attached to some of its older films on Disney+ to remove references to diversity and culture.

  • Deloitte told U.S. employees working with government clients to remove pronouns from their email signatures and said it would roll back its DEI goals and cease issuing diversity reports—but the firm’s United Kingdom branch told its staff diversity “remains a priority” and it would stand by its diversity goals.

Feb. 10, 2025

  • PBS—which Trump has repeatedly called for defunding—shuttered its diversity, equity and inclusion office, and those who worked in DEI roles have left the company, which PBS said in a memo to staff is to make sure it complies with Trump’s anti-DEI executive orders.

  • Days after it cut diversity hiring goals, a Google spokesperson told CNBC it no longer marks the start of cultural observances like Pride Month and Black History Month because “maintaining hundreds of moments manually and consistently globally wasn’t scalable or sustainable,” though it said it began making these changes in mid-2024.

Feb. 7, 2025

  • NPR first reported more than a dozen companies have pared back, or removed altogether, references to diversity, equity and inclusion in their 2024 annual reports to investors, including Pepsi, GM, Google, Disney, GE, Intel, PayPal, Chipotle and Comcast (GM removed all references to diversity, NPR reported, while Pepsi removed nearly all references after writing in its investor report last year DEI is a “competitive advantage.”)

  • Professional services company Accenture said it would no longer use diversity targets in hiring and promoting, citing the Trump administration’s push for private companies to roll back DEI goals, the company’s chief executive Julie Sweet said in a memo to staff, Bloomberg reported.

  • Amazon’s annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for 2024 omitted a section included in the company’s prior annual report, which indicated Amazon has a focus on “inclusion and diversity” in hiring (the news was first reported by CNBC).

Feb. 6, 2025

  • The government-funded railroad service Amtrak confirmed to Bloomberg it would roll back its DEI programs and policies, which appeared to include efforts to hire and promote diverse employees and employee resource groups, according to the company’s 2023 diversity report.

Feb. 5, 2025

  • Google informed its employees in an email that it will no longer have hiring targets around improving diverse representation among its staff, The Wall Street Journal first reported, and it is evaluating whether to continue other DEI programs and release DEI reports—though it will continue having resource groups for underrepresented staff members.

Jan. 28, 2025

  • The Smithsonian Institution told employees its diversity office is closing as a “first step” to address Trump’s new federal policy that declared DEI programs as “dangerous” and “demeaning,” the Washington Post reported, and the link to the institution’s 2022 diversity and inclusion initiatives report and link to its equal employment opportunity policy are broken.

Jan. 24, 2025

  • Target, which had already curbed its LGBTQ Pride merchandise line in response to conservative backlash, announced it would pull back on racial hiring targets, end its Racial Equity Action and Change program and cease participation in external diversity surveys, with chief community impact and equity officer Kiera Fernandez telling employees in a memo the decisions were made based on “many years of data” and an effort to stay “in step with the evolving external landscape.”

Jan. 17, 2025

  • The FBI confirmed in a statement to Forbes it had closed its DEI office—a frequent target of attacks by Republicans—in December, prompting President-elect Donald Trump to demand the agency “preserve and retain all records” relating to the shuttered office as he accused the FBI of “corruption” in a Truth Social post.

Jan. 10, 2025

  • Amazon said it would roll back what it called “outdated programs and materials” in an internal memo, though it did not specify what would be discontinued, while certain programs aimed at addressing disparities would continue until the disparities are eliminated.

  • Meta said in a memo the company ended several programs intended to increase its hiring of diverse candidates, including its equity and inclusion training programs, after Janelle Gale, Meta’s vice president of people, said the “legal and policy landscape” surrounding DEI efforts in the U.S. is “changing.”

Jan. 6, 2025

  • McDonald’s announced it would abandon specific diversity targets, cease participation in external surveys that measure company demographics and would rename its diversity team to “Global Inclusion Team,” citing the Supreme Court decision that ended affirmative action at universities and similar DEI walkbacks by other corporations, though it said it would continue to report demographic information in its own annual report.

Nov. 25, 2024

  • Walmart said it would abandon its DEI commitments, including winding down a Center for Racial Equity nonprofit it had founded in 2020 with a $100 million, 5-year commitment, ceasing third-party sellers from offering certain LGBTQ-themed products on its website, no longer participating in the Human Rights Campaign’s external surveys and phasing out the term “diversity, equity and inclusion” in company documents.

Nov. 1, 2024

  • Boeing dismantled its global diversity, equity and inclusion department and redirected its staff to its human resources department to focus on talent acquisition and employee experience, Bloomberg reported.

Sept. 4, 2024

  • Molson Coors, which had in 2023 defended a feminist-themed ad that sparked conservative backlash, said it would abandon supplier diversity quotas, shift DEI training sessions to focus on business objectives and stop participating in external diversity surveys, despite previously receiving a perfect 100 from the Human Rights Campaign for its LGBTQ policies.

Aug. 28, 2024

  • Lowe’s said in an internal memo it would combine its employee resource groups into one umbrella organization, cease participating in HRC surveys and would stop participating in external events like Pride parades.

Aug. 28, 2024

  • Ford Motor Co. informed employees it would stop participating in external diversity surveys and would evolve its employee resource groups to focus on networking and mentorship to all employees, citing the evolving “external and legal environment related to political and social issues.”

Aug. 22, 2024

  • Jack Daniel’s manufacturer Brown-Forman told employees it would no longer tie executive compensation to DEI progress, remove workforce and supplier diversity goals and cease participating in the HRC index, citing the shifting “legal and external landscape.”

Aug. 19, 2024

  • Harley-Davidson said it abandoned its “DEI function” in April and said it does not utilize diversity quotas for hiring or suppliers, and that it would no longer participate in HRC surveys or partner with sponsors that do not focus on its “loyal riding community.”

July 16, 2024

  • Farm equipment manufacturer John Deere said it would no longer support “cultural awareness” events like Pride parades and would audit company documents to remove “socially-motivated messages,” adding that diversity quotas and pronoun identification have never been company policy, though it said it would continue to internally track employee diversity.


DEI is Weaponized to Discriminate and Persecute

From a notice posted on May 25th 2025 by Frank Xu of the Californians for Equal Rights Foundation...

The ego-centric, divisive, and vanity-filled religion of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is not just a harmless mental exercise. Fully fledged and given the right environment, it can turn into a deadly weapon of discrimination, character assassination and persecution. We have seen the cult wreaking havoc in American schools. It is also rampant in workplaces. Today, our report will take you to one of the most powerful public entities and the country’s largest treated water supplier – the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), where a multiyear, union-led campaign resulted in overt racial discrimination, job losses, harassment and retaliation

Californians for Equal Rights Foundation


Three former employees at MWD’s Eagle Mountain Pump Plant have sued the district for race and gender discrimination, while one current district-level employee is suing for retaliation. These claims revolve around a union leader who previously worked under the three former employees as an “Operations and Maintenance Tech.” Going to work with an agenda to purge her team of “white males” and “colonialism,” this union personality turned the workplace into a toxic and hostile environment with remarks such as: “all you white boys from Arizona are all racist and bigots,” “I will do whatever it fxxking takes to get rid of [the white manager],” “you better get on board or go back where you came from.” When reported for her bigoted comments and harassment, this individual turned the table and made false claims against her superiors in a “Me-too” style media campaign, effectively causing the subjects of her accusations their jobs and reputation. 
 
MWD leadership, which had just pledged participation in a nationwide movement for equity,  dismissed an internal investigation from its Human Resources Department which proved the union leader’s claims false. Instead, they chased the winds of progressive culture and doubled down by calling on law enforcement(including a SWAT team!) to do a threat assessment on one of the managers. And what about the HR manager who did nothing wrong but to report findings of no harassment? She was punished, sidelined and heavily monitored at her job for not siding with the union or diversity. 
 
You may ask: what enables and emboldens individuals to make false accusations, cause tremendous grief to those accused (and their families) and get away with the lies? Well, in the name of DEI, there can be “good racism” and justice warriors can get away with anything! This said union leader is still in active and gainful employment at MWD, while the accused had their livelihood and peace stripped away. In the meantime, the quality of work necessary for moving water for millions of Californians give way to the pursuit of ideological purity. The same kind of dogma has made Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s indefensible race-based hiring practices (under the banner of “diversity”) fashionable and acceptable.


Luckily, the Federal Government is investigating Johnson’s “racial diversity” scheme. But in California, we still need to fight from the bottom up.


So take some time to engage in the fight as you can.

The woke culture is destroying America and its future generations!


We need all hands on deck to stop the attacks on our cultural values and our kids. All Americans must ACT NOW!


Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Funding

Continues to Pour In...

Per an investigative report by Defending Education, we highlight here those portions of the report involving California schools.

TOTAL TRACKING

Number of States: 44 plus the District of Columbia

Number of colleges and universities: 130

Number of DEI funds: 281

Total amount of DEI donations/funding tracked: $373,344,424

Defending Education


SUMMARY
American universities, especially in the wake of George Floyd and Black Lives Matter, have established funds that focus on the advancement of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) inside the institutions. The purpose of these funds range from the establishment of identity-based scholarships to funding DEI related programming on campuses.


While President Trump’s Executive Orders have incentivized universities to take down webpages and halt DEI related programmings, it does not mean that these institutions are necessarily ending these practices permanently. In some cases that are captured in this report, universities just rebranded the fund(s) or program.


To date, we have been able to track down over $373,344,424 in donations to fund institution DEI programs, scholarships, and offices. While some of the funding has been tracked down via “Day of Giving” style campaign webpages, the vast majority of the money has been traced through university announcements, webpages, and reports.


The information contained in this report primarily covers the years from 2021 to present. We aim to highlight these funds as well as current and past DEI-based programs in higher education. This report contains both current and archived university webpages which highlight these DEI funds and the purpose for them.


CALIFORNIA HIGHLIGHTS

  • The University of California, Berkeley collected $186,420 in donations for “Increasing Diversity and Opportunity at Cal” during its “Big Give 2025” campaign.

  • The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of the Arts and Architecture includes its “Anti-racism Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion” program which includes the UCLA Arts Racial Equity Fund which is an “AEDI scholarship fund established to support the realization of a more inclusive, equitable, and representative School of the Arts and Architecture with an emphasis on recruitment and retention practices rooted in diversifying our school community,” and was “created to address disparities in representation, to increase access to education, to strengthen the recruitment and retention of under-represented students.”

  • The University of Southern California’s Race and Equity Center features a “National DEI Defense Fund” that is intended to be used to counter anti-DEI efforts such as “ban books,” the elimination of “diversity and inclusion educational programs,” and the suppression of the “teaching of truths about America’s racial past and present.”

The University of Southern California’s National DEI Defense Fund states that it is “one of many ways the USC Race and Equity Center is countering politicized efforts to ban books, eliminate diversity and inclusion educational programs, and suppress the teaching of truths about America’s racial past and present” and is “committed to using evidence to protect the rights of students and families from misinformation, and to ensure that educators are able to responsibly prepare equity-minded citizens.”


Contributions to the fund will be used to “purchase and mail free DEI-focused books to students,” “offer financial support to high-quality DEI-focused educational programs and initiatives that have been disadvantaged by politicized, ill-informed budget cuts,” “provide legal support,” “raise national consciousness about threats to democracy and support the formation of DEI defense coalitions across the country,” and “deploy trusted experts who can testify in anti-DEI legislative 

hearings and provide evidence-informed guidance to K-12 and higher education leaders, school board members, and elected officials.”


CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY SPECIFICS


The following is not a comprehensive list. As universities continue to remove webpages, links may be taken down or redirected. These will be updated whenever possible.


An * denotes that an archived page has been used in place of the original because that institution has removed the specific webpage.


California Polytechnic Institute*

California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt

California State University Chico

Loyola Marymount University

Otis College of Art and Design

Sacramento State University

Santa Clara University

Scripps College

Stanford University

University of California, Berkeley

University of California, Davis

University of California, Irvine

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

University of California, San Francisco

University of California, Santa Barbara

University of Southern California


Read the full report



Share information with Defending Education



Addressing Obscene Books In School Libraries

Per a post from Karen England, an advocate for the proper education of America's children. Her organization Take Back the Classroom has been working diligently to see to it that age inappropriate materials are removed from school libraries:

Take Back the Classroom

[I]t is imperative that all school districts review their policies and ensure they are following the Supreme Court ruling [(see below)].  This will not only create a safer and more respectful environment for students, but also ensure that the district is not liable for any legal repercussions.


We urge all school administrators and boards to take this matter seriously and take appropriate action to address pervasive vulgarity in their schools.

Karen England, founder of Take Back the Classroom


"Parents are the first and strongest advocates for their children. When we stand up and speak out, we can take back the classroom, reclaim our rights, and protect our kids from state-sponsored grooming."


- Karen England

Founder, Take Back The Classroom


In 1982, the Supreme Court provided guidance on how school boards and administrators should address pervasive vulgarity in their schools. It is important to note that a Supreme Court ruling supersedes any state law or local district policy.


The three key points when addressing obscene materials within schools:

  1. School boards and administrators are responsible for supervising the education of students in their care, and as such can remove materials that they deem unsuitable or pervasively vulgar.

  2. School boards cannot impede a student’s right to read a book just because the board objects to a certain view point or idea contained within that book.

  3. School boards need to follow well defined, established procedures when removing materials from school libraries. 


REMOVE: Reviewing Explicit Materials, Opposing Vulgar Education

Download guide to remove porn in schools

Pornographic books have infiltrated classrooms and libraries for the purpose of grooming our children under the guise of education.


It is time to take back control.


View the free, step by step guide that will help you understand how to identify and how to remove pornographic materials from a child's school.


Concerned citizens

are not the enemy.

We're the firewall.


- Karen England


Search for Pornographic Materials in Your School


Help Spread the Word...


This is a free resource built to support concerned parents throughout the United States. You can help bring awareness to the problem and the offered solution by taking a moment to LIKE, COMMENT, and/or SHARE on your social media space(s). Together we can make a difference.


X (Twitter)


X (Twitter): https://x.com/KarenEngland/status/1910318284487983497

Facebook


Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1D4mGr8LEj/

Instagram


Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIRFwE6OWdT/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link



Support the Board Trustees

Who Protect Children and Promote Liberty

Support Santa Clara County schoolboard trustees who support parental rights and preserve Christian values. They are:


Oak Grove School District:

Otila Torres

San Jose Unified School District:

Nicole Gribstad

Franklin-McKinley School District:

Marc Cooper

Morgan Hill School District:

Pam Gardiner, Rebecca Munson

Alum Rock Union School District:

Linda Chavez

Cupertino Union School District:

Long Jiao


Schools should not be causing students stress and confusion. Schools should be educating and promoting understanding of the proper role of American citizenship. Schools should not be pushing the idea that gender is a fluid attribute. Schools should not be indoctrinating children in woke ideology. Schools should be teaching truth. Objective truth.

A couple of items upcoming schoolboard election items to note.


Oak Grove School District will have three trustee seats coming up for grabs in 2026. Just imagine having that district with a majority of its board members supporting policies that promote parental rights. (One can dream...).


Union School District is looking for a new trustee to fill the seat vacated by Mr. Doug Evans, who has moved out of the district as of May 2nd 2025. The vacancy for the remainder of Evans' term (June 2025 through Nov. 2026) will be filled by Board appointment. The application period is now open and runs through June 6, 2025 at 4:30 pm. Anyone interested in being considered for the position should submit an application, which can be filled out online at the district's website or delivered in person (or via email) after downloading and printing the application pdf file.


The Fire of Liberty Show
Watch Episodes on Spotify
Watch Episodes on Apple Podcasts


Sign the petition...
Read and Sign the Open Letter to CIF


California's Inappropriate Use of Grant Funds

Read and sign the open letter to California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond.


We, the undersigned, write to express our concern regarding the allocation of state funds to Pajaro Valley Unified School District (PVUSD) in support of its ethnic studies programming. Specifically, we are troubled by the district’s use of an Anti-Bias Education Grant -- awarded in the maximum amount of $200,000 -- for initiatives that, in our view, undermine the grant's stated goals of inclusivity and anti-discrimination.


We respectfully urge the California Department of Education to revoke the remaining $180,000 in Anti-Bias grant funds allocated to PVUSD.

Read and sign the letter online
Superintendent Tony Thurmond

Superintendent Tony Thurmond


Bad Bills Continue to Plague California

Where is the Republican oposition?

Per a report posted to Save California:


See the evidence of "Republicans" approving of and advancing evil bills by Democrat Party legislators.


And these are truly evil bills -- pushing or promoting baby-killing and sexual confusion. Any "Republican" voting for

Save California Insider News

them is untrustworthy to represent your values.


Who are the "Republicans" already voting this year to advance evil bills of the Democrat Party politicians?


AB 40: Expands the definition of emergency medical services to include "reproductive health service" so that ER doctors can perform baby-killing abortions. On April 21, this baby-killing bill passed the Assembly floor (voting yes were nearly all the Democrats and Republican Greg Wallis).


AB 260: Pushes dangerous chemical abortions upon minors. This bad bill requiring pharmacists to dispense abortion pills, while exempting pushers of abortion drugs from "civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action." AB 260 would also require Medi-Cal and private insurance plans to offer dangerous abortion drugs, and would also promote baby-killing abortions in several other ways. On April 29, this awful bill was approved in the Assembly Business and Professions Committee (voting yes were all the Democrats and Republican Juan Alanis).


AB 932: Orders public schools and city/county/special districts that biological males must be permitted to play on females' teams and use females' locker rooms and restrooms, and vice versa -- or risk a private party lawsuit threatening financial damages.


As the latest Legislative Counsel's Digest describes, AB 932 would prohibit "a city, county, city and county, special district, school district, county office of education, or charter school from discriminating against a person on the basis of sex or gender in the operation, conduct, or administration of community youth athletics programs or interscholastic athletic programs, or in the allocation of parks and recreation facilities and resources or school and recreation facilities and resources that support or enable these programs."


On April 29 in the Assembly Education Committee, all 3 Republicans -- Dixon Dixon, Alexandra Macedo, and Kate Sanchez -- joined nearly all the committee's Democrats in supporting this deceptive bill harming real girls and real women.


AB 86: Would require the California State Board of Education to adopt K-8 "sexual health education materials." This deceitfully brief bill reads: "On or before July 1, 2028, the state board shall adopt instructional materials for health education for kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, pursuant to the requirements of this article and in alignment with the health curriculum framework adopted by the state board in 2019."


"Health curriculum framework" in AB 86 is a direct reference to the anti-family "health curriculum framework" approved in 2019 by the State Board of Education, which is all based on AB 329 from 2016, requiring kids to be positively taught to accept masturbation, oral sex, teen fornication, homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality, abortion, and more.


On March 12, this anti-family bill was approved by the Assembly Education Committee (voting yes were nearly every Democrat and Republicans Josh Hoover of east Sacramento County and Leticia Castillo* of west Riverside County). *To her credit, Castillo later issued a public statement, saying she's realized what AB 86 would do, and promising to vote "no" on the Assembly floor.


See documentation of these and other bills at the SaveCalifornia.com Legislation Center.

Our advice is, don't promote evil by voting for RINOs. Better they lose election. You'll have a Democrat Party representative for 2-4 years while you and others expose his or her evil votes, while recruiting a constitutional conservative to run and win. Drain the swamp!


Lastly, while we wish we didn't have to report these disgusting facts, we wish even more that these "Republicans" had not betrayed your moral, family values. SaveCalifornia.com is not "owned" by any of them, and our independent Christian-values organization can be trusted to stand for children and families and report to you needful facts that others won't.

PLEASE TAKE ACTION: Urge Republican state legislators (find them here) to stand against these Democrat tyrannical 'trans' bills targeting children.


Realize the only practical way to defeat these wicked bills is for Republican legislators to a) stand, b) raise their microphone, and c) speak to expose what the bill would do. This is the only way to get the attention of "swing district" Democrats!


Also realize there's a terrible trend of Republicans not speaking against "LGBTQIA+" bills. So call your GOP legislators to "raise expectations" and demand they speak!


Want to do more against these tyrannical, anti-child "LGBTQIA+" bills? Call other Republicans and leave a message. But do so after hours (7pm to 8am, and weekends), without disclosing your name or community, since offices routinely ignore calls they know are out of district (but they'll take messages from various telephone prefixes).


Here's the list of every current Republican in the California State Legislature. You can leave brief voicemails for any or all of them, either not identifying yourself or simply saying you're "a conservative voter," and telling them you want him or her to opose any tyrannical Democrat 'trans' bills that target children.


19 ASSEMBLY REPUBLICANS
Josh Hoover of Folsom 916-319-2007 (he already voted yes on AB 86 in committee)
Greg Wallis of Rancho Mirage 916-319-2047
Juan Alanis of Modesto 916-319-2022
Carl DeMaio of San Diego 916-319-2075
Laurie Davies of Laguna Niguel 916-319-2074
Phillip Chen of Brea 916-319-2059
Diane Dixon of Newport Beach 916-319-2072
Heath Flora of Ripon 916-319-2009
Tom Lackey of Palmdale 916-319-2034
Tri Ta of Westminster 916-319-2070
Stan Ellis of Bakersfield 916-319-2032
David Tangipa of Fresno 916-319-2008
Alexandra Macedo of Visalia 916-319-2033
Heather Hadwick of Redding 916-319-2001
Joe Patterson of Rocklin 916-319-2005
Kate Sanchez of Rancho Santa Margarita 916-319-2071
James Gallagher of Yuba City 916-319-2003
Leticia Castillo of Corona 916-319-2058
Jeff Gonzalez of Coachella 916-319-2036
(NOTE: Assembly Republican Bill Essayli's seat is currently vacant)


10 STATE SENATE REPUBLICANS
Marie Alvarado-Gil of Amador County 916-651-4004
Stephen Choi of Orange County 916-651-4037
Megan Dahle of Redding 916-651-4001
Shannon Grove of Bakersfield 916-651-4012
Brian Jones of San Diego County 916-651-4040
Roger Niello of Placer County 916-651-4006
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh of San Bernardino County 916-651-4019
Mr. Kelly Seyarto of Riverside County 916-651-4032
Tony Strickland of Orange County 916-651-4036
Suzette Valladares of Santa Clarita 916-651-4023


"Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

Jesus Christ, Savior of the world and God in the flesh, in Matthew 18:6



Off The Press  @OffThePress1            



WATCH: Celeste Diest, a high school athlete who cried to her school board last month about having to undress in front of a biological male, was HECKLED Tuesday as she defended herself from accusations of being "transphobic."


Celeste, a runner, described the "traumatizing" experience last month to the Lucia Mar Unified School District in California. She urged officials to protect women-only spaces and opportunities.


"Currently, perception and feelings are being used as evidence to qualify oneself as a woman," she said Tuesday. "I'd like to mention I'm not transphobic ... The reason why I'm speaking is because my rights and safety are no longer valued."

Video clip

WATCH: A Huntington Beach California resident says a book teaching children "how to stroke their male genitalia for pleasure" is available in the city library.


Huntington Beach will decide next month whether to disband a board tasked with reviewing library books for sexually explicit content. The resident read aloud from "Let's Talk About It" to the community to push for the board to continue.


"I'm tired of the false claims that the city council is trying to ban books about puberty ... If you vote yes on this, you are either a groomer or a pedophile or both," she said.

Video clip

WATCH: A California high schooler says she changes for track practice in her car to avoid sharing the locker room with biological males.


Audrey Vanherweg is a junior on the track team at Lucia Mar Unified School District. Just last month, another girl on the team cried to the school board about having to undress in front of a biological male.


Audrey told the board last night she was there to stick up for her teammate, as well as to "protect women's sports."


"I strongly disagree with what is going on in the girls' locker room and on the girls' track team," Audrey said. "I change in my car for track practice because I feel way more comfortable in my car than in our own school's locker room."

Video clip


Become a Part of the Frontlines...

The Santa Clara chapter of Moms for Liberty would like to invite anyone interested in working as the group's vice-chair to give the idea serious consideration. It is both a rewarding and important task


Qualifications for the role include:


* Dedication to the idea of fighting for the survival of America by unifying, educating and empowering parents to defend their parental rights at all levels of government.



* Advocacy for the proper and effective education of America's youth.


* Understanding of precisely how we engage with the public to

- Promote liberty

- Spread awareness

- Engage on key issues

- Hold leaders accountable

- Oppose government overreach

- Activate for patriots to public service

* The ability to act fearlessly as a joyful warrior, someone who is willing to stand on solid principles and fight for what is right, especially when faced with a hostile environment.


Interested in learning more? Please reach out to our chapter's membership coordinator Kingslee.


Celebrating Parental Rights


The Supreme Court released its landmark parental rights decision in Pierce v. Society of Sisters on June 1, 1925.


Exactly 100 years ago.


The Supreme Court of the United States


When in the Court’s most recent parental rights case (Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000)) Justice O’Connor wrote for the plurality that “[t]he liberty interest at issue in this case -- the interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children -- is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court,” she cited Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925) as its foundation. 


This is not to say that parental rights are given by the Supreme Court, nor by the government, nor even by the Constitution. These are “pre-political” rights, derived from nature before any government is ever involved. But the Supreme Court’s recognition of this liberty as a constitutionally protected right had its beginnings in Meyer and Pierce.


The Court in Pierce famously declared:

The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.


Stemming from that clear pronouncement, parental rights have become among the most universally recognized rights in American jurisprudence. Since Pierce, the Court had uniformly recognized the liberty of parents to direct the lives of their minor children without interference by the government.


Unfortunately, this Supreme Court recognition is not always reflected in the policies and practices of government institutions, including child welfare agencies, some public schools, and even many lower courts and state courts.


But the precedent is firmly established, thanks to Pierce.



Per a summary offered by Professors Caroline Fredrickson (Georgetown University Law Center) and Ilan Wurman (Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University):


Pierce v. Society of Sisters is a “substantive due process” case. Substantive due process stands for the proposition that some rights are so fundamental that the state cannot regulate them without exceptional justification, even if there is no written constitutional prohibition on the government’s power. In an era of widespread animus against Catholics, Oregon sought to shutter parochial schools and force parents to send their children to public schools. The Court struck down this law as unreasonably interfering with the liberty of a parent to raise a child in the manner that the parent sees fit.


“The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.”


 Supreme Court decision 

Pierce v. Society of Sisters 


Read the full case



Want to See the Change? Be the Change...


If you share our concern over what has been taking place in our classrooms, please consider joining with us as we fight for families, for children, for education, for truth, and for common sense.

We continue to ask people whether they understand what is now taking place within our school systems. We continue to provide information and resources to help people, especially parents, gain some idea of what's being taught to kids (and why). And yes, we continue to ask people to get involved and help with the lifting.

We fight against children being taught to hate their country, to judge people based on the color of their skin, and to ignore the basic truths of biology. We fight against the sexualization in school of little ones and the destruction of the innocence of youth. Perhaps most importantly, we fight to ensure that the proper teaching of math, reading and writing remain at the forefront of a child's education.

The idea that it is parents who are responsible for raising, educating, and seeing to the well being of their kids, that is sacrosanct.

Join with us in preserving the attributes and ideals of this great nation. Associate Membership comes free of dues.

Become a Member


Feel free to forward this newsletter to friends and family. Actually anyone who acknowledges the fundamental right of parents to raise, educate, and protect their children are invited to join with us. We are gathering a group of joyful warriors, folks who understands why (and for whom) we fight.

Organizations whose efforts we support...

Free Now Foundation

Protecting and preserving civil liberties and health rights for all, with a focus on children...

Parents Defending Education
Turning Point USA
PragerU Kids
Parents' Rights In Education


Think on this...



THOSE WHO HAVE LONG ENJOYED SUCH PRIVILEGES AS WE ENJOY

FORGET IN TIME THAT MEN HAVE DIED TO WIN THEM.

- Franklin D. Roosevelt



Moms for Liberty Santa Clara County operates as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization.

The organization's primary mission is to organize, educate and empower parents
to defend their parental rights at all levels of government.


Visit us at https://momsforlibertysantaclara.com
Email us at MomsForLibertySCC@gmail.com

Want to read past newsletters? Click Here
Wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter? Click Here


Our physical mailing address: 1050 Kiely Blvd.  # 2453  Santa Clara, CA  95055